Senior Officers 'still Target Other Crimes Above Child Grooming'

[MisterrSingh]

That's messed up the cops were involved. The media needs to hammer bent coppers as much as they do the brown people that do this kind of filth.

[dallysingh101]

No wonder the police and social services stood around playing dumb when certain apnay were making noise about apneean being groomed and abused.

I'm just wondering if they'd still play it down like that. I think now the spotlight is on gorean with paks, paks might refocus their attention on apneean.

[Ranjeet01]

No wonder the police and social services stood around playing dumb when certain apnay were making noise about apneean being groomed and abused.

I'm just wondering if they'd still play it down like that. I think now the spotlight is on gorean with paks, paks might refocus their attention on apneean.

It will be a lot harder for them, there is more scrutiny on them as a community.

[Jeevan]

On 25/06/2015 at 9:42 AM, Jeevan said:

After our six brave Sikhs were jailed in preventing serious crimes in taking place at the Moghul Durbar why does our own community even vote Labour?

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/apr/25/keith-vaz-helped-kill-90s-probe-greville-janner-claims-why-is-vaz-silent-now

Keith Vaz helped kill a 90s probe into the Greville Janner claims: why is he silent now?

Jay Rayner

The MP was among those whose support for Lord Janner stifled an investigation into child-abuse allegations. Vaz should admit his error

Political calculation? Keith Vaz. Photograph: Martin Godwin

 

Saturday 25 April 2015 20.48 BST Last modified on Sunday 26 April 2015 00.01 BST

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share via Email
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Google+

 

 

Keith Vaz, prospective parliamentary candidate for Leicester East, is a keen user of Twitter. On any given day, the veteran MP, who has held the constituency for the Labour party since 1987, can tweet half a dozen times or more, spraying a mix of feeble self-promotion and blunt political rhetoric. Except at the moment. Last Sunday, he tweeted his thanks to the Bollywood star Abhishek Bachchan, who had visited the city to campaign alongside him. Since then, Vaz has been uncharacteristically silent.

It’s bizarre, because finally there’s something people want to hear him talk about. Last week in the Observer, I described how my 1991 investigations into allegations of child sex abuse by the former Leicester MP Greville, now Lord, Janner, were brought to a halt by supportive statements in the Commons from MPs. Key among them was that by Vaz, who said that his close colleague had been “the victim of a cowardly and wicked attack”.

When news first broke on 16 April that Janner would not stand trial on 22 counts of child abuse because of his dementia, I asked Vaz via Twitter whether he would care to comment about his support for Janner. He first reacted by blocking me. He unblocked me, but didn’t respond.

Lord Janner could face dementia test, child abuse lawyer says

 

Read more

I assumed that he would speak after my article was published and widely circulated, but no. A week on, and the failure to respond properly to the issues I have raised continues.

The most generous analysis is that Vaz is making a blunt political calculation in the midst of an election: he just has to tough it out. The problem is that the longer he fails to address the issues fully, the more complicit he seems in a passive establishment effort to help Janner to avoid facing charges in court.

It’s not as if there isn’t a form of words he could use. He could reference the recognised cleverness of suspected abusers, and express regret if anything he once said added to the distress of Janner’s alleged victims. It seems he has decided against that. As a result, a matter that could have been consigned to history remains very much alive.

More features Topics

• Keith Vaz
• Child protection
• Children
• Crime

I said this many years ago why do Sikhs vote Labour, this party they do not represent Sikhs and actually harm us as a panth!

I also understand now why Keith Vaz and the Labour Party protected Janner!

I also understand know why Keith Vaz and Labour failed to speak up for the Sikhs who stopped one of our girls from being abused!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3772784/Let-s-party-started-Married-Labour-statesman-Keith-Vaz-met-male-prostitutes-London-flat-wanted-man-drugs.html

 

[Cisco_Singh]

Sikhs have no friends in the political arena this is because as a community we are not united we don't have enough political representation or educated Sikhs in influential positions, Councillors, MP's , business leaders etc. 

We have multiple organisations claiming to represent Sikhs. None of which have unity amongst themselves and are internally corrupt themselves. Sikh Council Uk, Sikh federation uk, Federation of Sikh organisations etc etc.

The powers that be know this very well hence they don't take the Sikh voice seriously.

Labour yes under their watch we saw the grooming gang epidemic covered up Rotherham, Rochdale, Keighley. Sheffield. Leicester moghul darbar etc. But it was also Tom Watson of Labour that was the main MP that helped release the papers regarding the uk government involvement in the 1984 Harmandar Sahib attack.

The conservatives have a long history of colluding with the Indian government against the Sikh political movement , Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher were close friends. A Nagar Kirtan in London was cancelled by the uk government in the 1980s at the request of the indian government... This was under the conservatives not Labour.

So if you want the Sikh voice to be heard get more Sikhs into influential positions. Without adequate political representation and a united front the powers that be will ignore you. One of Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaja 52 hukums is for Sikhs to be actively engage in politics and become politically aware, maharaj had the foresight to know that the future yudh is just ad much political as is it physical.

 

[Jeevan]

On 04/09/2016 at 0:21 PM, Cisco_Singh said:

Sikhs have no friends in the political arena this is because as a community we are not united we don't have enough political representation or educated Sikhs in influential positions, Councillors, MP's , business leaders etc. 

We have multiple organisations claiming to represent Sikhs. None of which have unity amongst themselves and are internally corrupt themselves. Sikh Council Uk, Sikh federation uk, Federation of Sikh organisations etc etc.

The powers that be know this very well hence they don't take the Sikh voice seriously.

Labour yes under their watch we saw the grooming gang epidemic covered up Rotherham, Rochdale, Keighley. Sheffield. Leicester moghul darbar etc. But it was also Tom Watson of Labour that was the main MP that helped release the papers regarding the uk government involvement in the 1984 Harmandar Sahib attack.

The conservatives have a long history of colluding with the Indian government against the Sikh political movement , Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher were close friends. A Nagar Kirtan in London was cancelled by the uk government in the 1980s at the request of the indian government... This was under the conservatives not Labour.

So if you want the Sikh voice to be heard get more Sikhs into influential positions. Without adequate political representation and a united front the powers that be will ignore you. One of Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaja 52 hukums is for Sikhs to be actively engage in politics and become politically aware, maharaj had the foresight to know that the future yudh is just ad much political as is it physical.

 

A very good analysis by Cisco_Singh, I particularly like the quote, 'We have multiple organisations claiming to represent Sikhs. None of which have unity amongst themselves and are internally corrupt themselves. Sikh Council Uk, Sikh federation uk, Federation of Sikh organisations etc etc.', and here lies the crux of the matter failed Sikh leadership!