Jump to content

It Is Wrong To Separate Gurus And Vaheguru


Recommended Posts

It is wrong to separate gurus and vaheguru. To say one gave darshaan, other didn't, one is with you, other isn't. Daas would like to see this stop.

I'm not too sure what you mean ??

Are you saying is it wrong to admire and feel more for Guru Nanakji than Guru Harkrishan ji for example ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not too sure what you mean ??

Are you saying is it wrong to admire and feel more for Guru Nanakji than Guru Harkrishan ji for example ??

No, people seem to separate guru and vaheguru not realizing the connection, this is why you have deras and babas.

They are basically trying to emulate the form of Akaal Puraakh because people don't realize gurus = god.

We don't worship the gurus but the jyot is the same in a way it is not within our soul as we are not there at that level.

Whether we get there or not, it doesn't matter because lol we won't last that long. :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^ Veer, Guru Nanak Dev Ji Maharaj ne Mool Mantar apne aap vare likheya si ya phir Akaal Purakh Parmathma nu?

Not like that, our guru is shabad guru which comes straight from Akal Puraakh.

What I'm trying to say is our 'gurus' were not just gurus and should have a higher place than normal humans if you want to treat them as a concept of god, even though you know the concept of vaheguru is higher that is fine.

Merely trying to say that is one way people will stay away from deras is realizing how important gurus are. (our real gurus, not fake ones today).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm not too sure what you mean ??

Are you saying is it wrong to admire and feel more for Guru Nanakji than Guru Harkrishan ji for example ??

I think he wants to separate Allah from his rasool, so Allah's true nabi rasool is Guru Nanak and for him he has confusion between the Gurus relation with Allah. Guru ji taught in janamsakhis about Allah not needing intercession or intermediation of any person that was born and died. And in bani allah reveals in guru granth sahib that let those tongues be burnt which say Allah is jooni (born/within the cycle of death + birth). In janamsakhis guru ji is recognised as a mortal so he is truly allah's rasool.

It Seems allah came to him in a dream and he isn't sure if it was Allah's true nabi rasool Guru Nanak or Allah himself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he wants to separate Allah from his rasool, so Allah's true nabi rasool is Guru Nanak and for him he has confusion between the Gurus relation with Allah. Guru ji taught in janamsakhis about Allah not needing intercession or intermediation of any person that was born and died. And in bani allah reveals in guru granth sahib that let those tongues be burnt which say Allah is jooni (born/within the cycle of death + birth). In janamsakhis guru ji is recognised as a mortal so he is truly allah's rasool.

It Seems allah came to him in a dream and he isn't sure if it was Allah's true nabi rasool Guru Nanak or Allah himself?

No. the arabic moon god, has nothing to do with me.

What I meant was not understood, so I shall move on.

You must hold the gurus in higher esteem than humans, and yet recognize that they are humans as well.

This means you must strive to always try and go to their place and be like them.

Killing of ego would mean you don't compare nor think you can be or match them, but that is not the point you are only striving to be a better sikh, whatever that means, and part of that meaning is:

Khalsa so jo chare tarang

Khalsa so jo kare nit jang

Khalsa so jo shastar ko taare

Khalsa so jo dust ko mare

VJKVJF||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use