Jump to content

Indians Eat, Read And Sleep Religion


gupt faujaan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Indians eat, read and sleep religion

IANS

NEW DELHI: Indians find it easier to reach god than have access to a school or hospital. India has more public places of worship - of its multiple faiths - than schools, colleges, hospitals and dispensaries put together.

And there is at least one place of religious worship at every kilometre of the country's road network of 2.4 million kilometres.

According to a wide-ranging survey by the Census of India, there are some 2.4 million places of worship in the country, as against 1.5 million schools and colleges and a mere 600,000 hospitals and dispensaries.

So if religion is the opium of the masses, millions of Indians are inhaling deeply.

Ranging from little painted stones in tree-shades to palatial complexes, these shrines dot the Indian landscape at regular intervals, commanding the devotion of countless worshippers.

The basic coloured stone idol, stained profusely with turmeric and vermilion, is a familiar sight while driving down Indian roads.

Hundreds of thousands of mosques, churches and gurdwaras, or Sikh shrines - small and big - also dot the Indian landscape.

Religion is a way of life for many Indians, but religious shrines appear to be now dominating governance, taking precedence over socio-development and economic issues.

To many it is no wonder that successive governments have been grappling over the Ayodhya temple-mosque dispute that has preoccupied Parliament sessions, elections and political discourse.

"This highlights the shortcoming in our social planning and structure," economist Pradeep Srivastava told IANS.

Srivastava, a senior consulta

nt with the National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER), said it was important to think about development policies and achievements, which were "sadly inadequate".

"The fact is that an illiterate person is happy to put whatever money he has in a temple. Indeed, there are many more temples than the Census has identified, as many people have temples in their own homes."

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is pushing for support to legislation to build a temple where the 16th-century Babri mosque stood before a Hindu mob razed it in 1992 claiming the site to be the birthplace of Lord Ram.

Former Tamil Nadu chief minister M Karunanidhi remarked this week that there was hardly a need for a temple in Ayodhya since there were "hundreds of temples for Ram throughout India and in Ayodhya too".

It was time, he added, to address many burning issues.

According to political analyst V B Singh, many villages have more than one religious shrine but the government had not been able to provide one school per village.

"Temples and mosques do not require so many permits," said Singh, who is with the Centre for study of Developing Societies. "People are free to create places of worship. This is their easiest penance as most people are god-fearing".

But a lot of land grabbing also goes in the name of religious places, pointed out eminent lawyer Rajeev Dhawan.

"The problem is not religiosity but greed and political obsession," said Dhawan, citing the example of the Ayodhya tangle.

"Under the garb of religion, people indulge in property grabbing, injury and violence to people. These are the people who push communal hatred for political purposes."

Chaitri Dua, a call centre professional, voiced the sentiments of many wearied citizens as she suggested that the Ayodhya spot along the Saryu river should be given to neither Hindus nor Muslims.

"It should be handed over for a hospital

or a school - that would be an example for thousands of other hospitals as donors would think twice before investing in religious buildings," said Dua.

Not everyone agrees, especially the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) that prides itself as the patron of the Ayodhya temple movement.

"The Ayodhya temple is not to be counted with others - it is a symbol of national pride, a shrine for a national hero," VHP leader Vireshwar Dwivedi told IANS with some irritation.

Dwivedi did not think it strange that India should have more religious institutions than all others put together.

"Why not? India is a religious country; people get satisfaction from worshiping god. For our well-being we have to have such shrines. Of course, there is nothing wrong with having some more schools and hospitals," said the VHP leader

http://www.newindpress.com/Newsitems.asp?I...festyle&rLink=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use