Jump to content

SGPC and RSS published a book full with disrespect of Sikh Guru Sahib's and false history


Recommended Posts

1. Its not about our interest its about history. He raised the question. SGPC is now getting history rewritten If they are not questioned they might come out with some more blunder.

2. Naam Simran is 24*7 concept. Start from missionaries make the show alive.

There is an edict from akal takhat about 7 years back asking sikhs not to cooperate with RSS. I am sure if Baldev sirsa brings this into attention of akal takhat they will look into this.

Baldev sirsa is a politician just like Badal and sarna are politicians.His intentions are suspect.

Missionaries are those who do not do Naam simran and they are the ones who call it parroting without understanding the concept.

So they top list of masands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an edict from akal takhat about 7 years back asking sikhs not to cooperate with RSS. I am sure if Baldev sirsa brings this into attention of akal takhat they will look into this.

Baldev sirsa is a politician just like Badal and sarna are politicians.His intentions are suspect.

Missionaries are those who do not do Naam simran and they are the ones who call it parroting without understanding the concept.

So they top list of masands.

He said that he brought it into notice of SGPC but no positive reply. This book should be banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GPS Veer Jee is spot on!

Just like I pointed out earlier...this is all politics. Why is it only Baldev Singh Sirsa Jee who is talking about this? Where is everyone else? Why is a politician the only one making a big deal out of it?

Also, it's not like this is the only book out there on Sikh history. To say that this book holds more seniority or importance than other books is overreacting. We already have lots of stuff written by Kala-Afghana and Ghagga, etc, which is just as bad as this book, if not worse. Even if this SGPC book is changed, there are probably still many copies out there in circulation, so the damage is already done. The only thing now is for SGPC to create a new book or an updated version.

Or how about this...Baldev Singh Sirsa Jee can write his own book by documenting all of the errors in the SGPC book and correcting them. Now that would be a proactive solution.

If Baldev Singh Sirsa Jee is truly worried about Sikhi and not politics...then he should have spoken out during the many incidents which took place in Delhi Gurdwaras under Sarna leadership.

If he can call Badal, SGPC and Jathedars RSS agents...then I would love to see him be impartial and be able to say the same about Sarna and his group.

You see...when you turn the tables...it's a totally different story and perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is written in book what he is stating then no sikh will tolerate it.

He says book states that Guru of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji was muslim. That means it is aligning sikhs with Muslims.

Then how does RSS bogey comes in the picture? Can this Baldev sirsa justify this logic. He is more a politician

than a religious person.He is stating that act of Massa ranghar was a lesser evil than written in this book.

Then he hops around elections of SGPC and DGPC. That is pure politics.

Lastly in 1999 if i remember , GS Tohra was president of SGPC and Bhai Rajit singh was jathedar of akal takhat.Then if he is so eager to involve RSS in this case then he should blame then president of SGPC>

Are you listening Mr Sirsa, a pithu of panch pardhani that sponsors tours of persons like dhundha to USA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an edict from akal takhat about 7 years back asking sikhs not to cooperate with RSS. I am sure if Baldev sirsa brings this into attention of akal takhat they will look into this.

Baldev sirsa is a politician just like Badal and sarna are politicians.His intentions are suspect.

Missionaries are those who do not do Naam simran and they are the ones who call it parroting without understanding the concept.

So they top list of masands.

Open your ears and listen to the video posted by the OP and then check for yourself if S Baldev Singh raised this issue with Akal Takht Sahib or not?

This is the sorry state of affairs of today's so called Sikhs who instead of protesting as one against this insult to our Gurus find suspicians in intentions

of those who raise these issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GPS Veer Jee is spot on!

Just like I pointed out earlier...this is all politics. Why is it only Baldev Singh Sirsa Jee who is talking about this? Where is everyone else? Why is a politician the only one making a big deal out of it?

Also, it's not like this is the only book out there on Sikh history. To say that this book holds more seniority or importance than other books is overreacting. We already have lots of stuff written by Kala-Afghana and Ghagga, etc, which is just as bad as this book, if not worse. Even if this SGPC book is changed, there are probably still many copies out there in circulation, so the damage is already done. The only thing now is for SGPC to create a new book or an updated version.

Or how about this...Baldev Singh Sirsa Jee can write his own book by documenting all of the errors in the SGPC book and correcting them. Now that would be a proactive solution.

If Baldev Singh Sirsa Jee is truly worried about Sikhi and not politics...then he should have spoken out during the many incidents which took place in Delhi Gurdwaras under Sarna leadership.

If he can call Badal, SGPC and Jathedars RSS agents...then I would love to see him be impartial and be able to say the same about Sarna and his group.

You see...when you turn the tables...it's a totally different story and perspective.

Thats the question which you need to answer. Where is everyone else?

Most of them are so gutless and lack self respect to raise their voices against this insult to our Gurus.

And for them this is "all politics."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is written in book what he is stating then no sikh will tolerate it.

He says book states that Guru of Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji was muslim. That means it is aligning sikhs with Muslims.

Then how does RSS bogey comes in the picture? Can this Baldev sirsa justify this logic. He is more a politician

than a religious person.He is stating that act of Massa ranghar was a lesser evil than written in this book.

Then he hops around elections of SGPC and DGPC. That is pure politics.

Lastly in 1999 if i remember , GS Tohra was president of SGPC and Bhai Rajit singh was jathedar of akal takhat.Then if he is so eager to involve RSS in this case then he should blame then president of SGPC>

Are you listening Mr Sirsa, a pithu of panch pardhani that sponsors tours of persons like dhundha to USA

"If it is written in book what he is stating then no sikh will tolerate it."

Perfect example of a political double talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure if this has been discussed already but this is really serious matter and needs special attention by pinning it or it changing the tittle to something more attentive.

I just saw this video and I can't describe it's too bad.

Dear Bhaji,

The video has been uploaded on youtube on the 15th of March, 2013.

The heading for the video says that it's been broadcast on the 16th of March, 2013.

Could you please help find out when the actual date of broadcast was?

The reason behind my doubt about the time-frame is because we've been on the phone with Baba Hari Singh ji Randhawa and Baba Lakhbir Singh ji Ratwara Saheb about the matter. Baba Hari Singh ji told us that there has been quite an outcry about this issue on stages in India and that it was all SGPC President's fault. Apparently, SGPC's even apologised about it MORE THAN A YEAR AGO!!!!

This does seem to be a political dirty-business!

Baba Lakhbir Singh ji asked us to get back to him tomorrow evening to get the updated news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Edit: apparently, we've also been told by a Singh from Ratwara Saheb (who generally handles stuff about news affairs) that the SGPC has said that they had simply been given the writings of Mcaullife and that this book is simply a translation of his book!!! I about to look for it on google....if someone else has read it, please could they confirm whether it is true or not?

If that is the case then didn't they read and agree with the translations before publishing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use