Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
gsinghysingh

Sant Baba Ranjit Dandrianwala

Recommended Posts

Balle Ni Balle @Kaljugi, that is the BEST post i have read since ive been involved with this forum (last year). Also jus wanna ask u a question, this baba, wat type of muslim was he? Apart from a shook one, loool. Na seriously wat i mean is, is he a sufi/peer? Coz if he was a sunni, he probably wudda told the singh 2 pee off unless he converts. Also how come he told the singh to hold a sehaj paat? or do u think he said 2 the singh, jus hold some sort of ceremony? im shockd the muslim didnt give him a taveet/muslim locket/string stuff. anyways, big up kaljugi, u went thru all that trouble 2 write that story, nuff love. Oh but be warned theres gonna the "Doubt brigade" with their million n one queries of the validity of this story.

HUUUUURRRRR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair play to pir ji.

back to op, I'm not a big fan of ranjit singhs dress sense or backing crew.. but he is very good at preaching and he is very in touch with the sangat... imo he is first rate when it comes inspiring and educating the common man - my point is u can respect someone without approving of everything they do.. disliking baba for points mentioned is pretty petty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair play to pir ji.

back to op, I'm not a big fan of ranjit singhs dress sense or backing crew.. but he is very good at preaching and he is very in touch with the sangat... imo he is first rate when it comes inspiring and educating the common man - my point is u can respect someone without approving of everything they do.. disliking baba for points mentioned is pretty petty.

A person's sense of style has nothing to do with his/her merits and character. By saying backing crew are you talking about his jatha? If you are, leaders of the Panth have almost always had companions. The Sikhs together would be a jatha. Those Singhs that are with him do Kirtan seva with him, I see nothing wrong with that. What fault do you see in that?

Its not like those guys are his possy to go around intimidating/impressing people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A person's sense of style has nothing to do with his/her merits and character. By saying backing crew are you talking about his jatha? If you are, leaders of the Panth have almost always had companions. The Sikhs together would be a jatha. Those Singhs that are with him do Kirtan seva with him, I see nothing wrong with that. What fault do you see in that?

Its not like those guys are his possy to go around intimidating/impressing people.

I think we're both makin the same point with regard to sense of style and character, I won't answer th second point because its not really a major issue - baba ji is one of the good guys s'all that matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have much knowledge but i have come to understand that every sant has a different role to play....they are here to motivate you in diff ways...its mentioned quite a bit as to how sant ji dresses...but its because of him that a lot of the youth thinks it good to wear a bana ...if u were to consistently listen to a few of his diwaans u wuldnt even question him...plus its funni how a mistake is bought up of such a great person which was made years ago but we fail to think the amount of mistakes we have made in the last week?? Day???

I apologise if nething sounds rude...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Balle Ni Balle @Kaljugi, that is the BEST post i have read since ive been involved with this forum (last year). Also jus wanna ask u a question, this baba, wat type of muslim was he? Apart from a shook one, loool. Na seriously wat i mean is, is he a sufi/peer? Coz if he was a sunni, he probably wudda told the singh 2 pee off unless he converts. Also how come he told the singh to hold a sehaj paat? or do u think he said 2 the singh, jus hold some sort of ceremony? im shockd the muslim didnt give him a taveet/muslim locket/string stuff. anyways, big up kaljugi, u went thru all that trouble 2 write that story, nuff love. Oh but be warned theres gonna the "Doubt brigade" with their million n one queries of the validity of this story.

HUUUUURRRRR

I have no idea, my friend. I heard the katha just like the rest of the sangat, but in my case I was watching the programme on my laptop at home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

superstitious ..miracles. fairy tale stories ...... this one is so much against gurmat .....

a true gursikh who understands gurmat will not be bothered by physical illness , and in fact death is a sweet experience , not something to be feared (jis marne te jag dare

hark sog jake nahi baree meet samaan , kaho nanak oh mukat jan

we need to spend some time studying SGGS and get gurmat first hand rather than through these sadhs .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

superstitious ..miracles. fairy tale stories ...... this one is so much against gurmat .....

What exactly was against Gurmat in the story?

a true gursikh who understands gurmat will not be bothered by physical illness , and in fact death is a sweet experience , not something to be feared (jis marne te jag dare

Easy to say and hard to do. We put our hand on a hot stove by mistake and we scream like little girls. The ego is good in the dirt, rather than worn like a crown.

hark sog jake nahi baree meet samaan , kaho nanak oh mukat jan

we need to spend some time studying SGGS and get gurmat first hand rather than through these sadhs .....

The advise of the Muslim Baba was to read Gurbani. If tomorrow a Hindu tells you out of pyare to do Sri Japji Sahib da paat, will you call him manmat? The fact the Muslim Baba could see Chardikala Singhs means the guy has done bhagti and has a high jeevan. Obviously a person with very little knowledge should never go to a different religious Baba because they can be easily fooled and mislead, but this Singh was in a completely different situation and wasn't going to follow or bow to the Muslim Baba.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOULDNT U ADAM N EVE IT!! we open a thread about ranjit singh dhadriawale, and guess wat, THERE's NEW allegation's of torture/mansions with women coming out. Im not too sure wats happning, but a guy on sikh channel has accused the "sant" of forcibly cutting his hair and stealing sangats money and being tortured.

Can someone claify wats happning? cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MUST WATCH NOW (9:30pm tonight, UK time): Please watch Sangat Television (Sky 847 in UK & Europe and www.SangatTelevision.org worldwide online) for an interview of Sant Baba Ranjit Singh Ji Dhadrianwale, just recorded, telling the truth behind recent 100% false allegations invented to disrupt Sikhi Parchaar and Amrit Sanchaar. Forward to all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welldone to sangat tv for being proactive to clear this up.

Sikh channel - disgrace. Biased info and made bhai ranjit Singh to be guilty. Also the uncle on Sikh ch highlighting importance of kesh...isnt his dhari trimmed?? Bhul chuk maaf if it isnt!

Fateh

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have any issues with his Parchaa it's all in line with Gurmat.. Donty really like his "kachhi Baani" and Simran methods though...Also his maturity level seem a bit low...Like for example when he reacted to the Babbu Maan song "Ik Baba Nanak Si "... Surely a pachaarak should have enough Gyaan to not react to such things....normally only the guilty react..almost as if he felt insecure about the Babbu Maan song.

Also I dont really think you can judge someone on statistics and measures such as " x amount of people took amrit " ... The question should be how many of those people were ready to take Amrit ??? Personally I think taking Amrit should not be allowed for anyone who feels like it...unless they have undergone traiining and assesment by maybe one of ther Panj Pyaray etc...who confirms they have attained a level where they can keep Rehit correctly, have knowledge of baani and scripture etc,...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PLEASE NOTE: Regular repeats of D-Live interview of Sant Baba Ranjit Singh Ji Dhadrianwale will be played again on Sangat Television (Sky 847 in UK & Europe and www.SangatTelevision.org worldwide online). This is the reply to the 100% false allegations invented by anti-Panthic forces to disrupt Sikhi Parchaar and Amrit Sanchaar. Watch Sangat Television during the following UK times for repeat play over the next 24 hours - 11:30pm, 2:00am, 9:30am, 1:30pm, 5:00pm, 8:30pm and 10:00pm. Forward to all.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We complain because we don't have enough Sikhs in politics. When we do have one we still complain because he's not a Mahapurkh. A generalisation that one could make is Sikhs in political power have not always adhered to maryada as strictly as janta. The same is true for many other communities, and just like Jagmeet they know where their loyalties lie - for the qaum. I find it hard to believe that his motives are otherwise. If they were, he would have been at an advantage had he still been a mona rather than an Amritdhari. While there's no doubt that Raajneeti from a Dharmic perspective should always contain elements of righteousness, the means to reaching the primary objective, which I believe in this case to be the betterment of the Sikh Qaum and amassing political influence and power to wield in the international arena, may well be outwardly adharmic. This especially applies at a personal level whereby one may be exempt from certain religious laws to serve the greater good. Executing Ranneeti and Raajneeti simply cannot be held to the standards of Rehat Maryada namely due to the fact that this is Kalyug. As stated in another post we cannot and should not expect the neetikaars to be pious and religious figures. Unless of course we're happy being personae non gratae forever. If it later becomes evident that his motivations, intentions, and loyalties lie elsewhere, by all means tear him down.
    • This exact question is in Asa Ki //...haumai kitho upjeh, kit sanjam eh jayee 
    •       Do you do Simran or Mool Mantar?    Don’t worry about this. As children we have all sorts of dreams which when we are younger have more of an impact on us remembering them. Because that was probably the first odd or chilling dream you had, so you remember it more. You have to stop being afraid of this, as I’m guessing you work yourself up and get anxious every year before that date. Even if you try not to, it still comes up as it’s been embedded for a long time. Tell your counsellor about this, he/she will help you to deal with the negativity of it that it has created.  You are going through a stressful time, but from what you are saying, he is not living with you. You need to make yourself strong internally and stand up to what he’s done. You need to think about yourself and your daughter and what’s best for you both, as he’s already left. Your in laws are probably feeling ashamed for their spoilt son? They do not have to compromise with his bad behaviour and how he’s treated you and your daughter.  I’m not sure what else to advise, as you are in this terrible situation, and only you know what you are going through, but I do hope things get better for you. Maybe contact one of the Sikh helplines?   
    • does it involve avoiding silver like the plague ?
×