Well, no, I don't think we would accept the interfaith marriage (as a principle).
The fact that someone may be married to a non-Sikh is simply reality. But we don't accept it as Sikh doctrine.
On the other hand, I've said many times on this board that we shouldn't bother with Sikh (or non-Sikh) politicians' personal lives. We should merely be concerned with their stance on Sikh issues.
Consider: Did Guru Gobind Singh ji bother with Bahadur Shah's personal morality with respect to women, or the fact that he was a Gursikh or not when Guru Sahib decided to support him to ascend to the Mughal throne?
Well done for just spouting the Hindutva line of we need fewer and fewer Sikhs
The Khalsa Panth is where it is important that we accept quality over quantity.
In the 1947 Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs had Sikh and Muslim numbers been equal then Sri Nankana Sahib would not be under Pakistani control today. Had there been more Sikhs (only 14% of all Punjabi's were Sikh in 1947) then 20% of the Sikh population would not have been murdered by the Muslims in the Pakistani Genocide of Sikhs.
In the 1984 Congress (Indira) Genocide of Sikhs had there been more than just a hundred Singhs with Sant Ji do you think Congress would have won? Had sehajdhari Sikhs been a majority in Delhi do you think there would have been state genocide against a majority population? How will Khalistan ever happen when Sikhs become a minority in Punjab the next few years thanks to people like you doing their level best to alienate people from the Sikh Panth rather than to grow the Panth in size?
Your own ancestors came into Sikhi from either a Hindu or Muslim background via marriage at a Gurdwara.
Sikhi is not the fastest growing religion but it is the fastest reducing religion in Punjab having gone from 63% of the population to around 55% today (whilst Radha Soami's, Nirankari's and all dera's are counted among Sikh numbers).
Between 2021 to 2031 Sikhs will be a minority in Punjab but people like you still find time to bash Preet Kaur Gill.
When it comes to your own son or grandson marrying a gori and you telling them they cannot marry in a Gurdwara then I hope that day you feel proud that you have alienated him, his wife and future generations away from Sikhi. Because at the rate people like you want to alienate young Sikhs like Preet Kaur Gill MP and her children away from Sikhi then there won't be many of us left in the UK by then given that we are only 0.7% of the population in the UK now!
Read my message to you in Inbox paji. I didn’t know Prof Surinder Singh walked with a stick. There’s Bhai Lakhwinder Singh too, I think he has visual problems, but I’m not sure what exactly. And Sant Baba Harbans Singh ji, I remember seeing him when I was younger, playing an instrument.
1st time I've seen this post, what a fantastic idea. Be worth approaching local committee to see if they are willing to support this initiative. Aside from soorma Singh's teaching and performing kirtan and Prof Surinder Singh who walks with a stick, all other kirtanis I've come across have been able bodied.
Her husband's name is Sunny Singh Chopra and he is a Sikh who attends Smethwick Gurdwara.
Yes 90% of Khatri's are mostly Muslims and Hindu's but 10% of Khatri's are actually Sikh.
Yes 80% of Jats are mostly Muslims and some Hindu's but that doesn't mean some cannot be Sikh.
We all know this thread was started by a non-Sikh troll but to assume that Khatri means Hindu is stupid.
Just because Nawaz Sharif former Prime Minister of Pakistan is from the Brahmin (Butt) caste like most of the Kashmiri terrorists and the London Brahmin Muslim terrorist (Khurram Butt) does it mean there cannot be any Brahmins who follow Hinduism?
If you are going to spout things which don't add up at least have the decency not to associate Sant Ji with your lies.