Jump to content

What Is Sachkhand And How Does It Look Like


scooter
 Share

Recommended Posts

AkhandEurope ji,

I agree with the you in regards to Sachkhand and writings of bhai sahib bhai Randhir Singh ji on subject of SachKhand. However I do not agree with comments such as, "Sant Jagjit Singh is very far from Gurmat" and I also disagree with you telling bhai N30 Singh ji which Gursikh he should follow. We can present our though on this subject then it is up to the person if they agree/disagree we cannot force our views on anyone.

It is good to have an opinion on certain subject but we must also make sure that we present our views in a respectable manner and try and not offend particular person or jathebandi/samprada.

Rabb Rakhe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a worm compared to gursikhs like Sant Jagjit Singh. The main thing in gurmat is to do naam/bani kmayee, so you could say Sant Jagjit Singh is living in the gurmat way, as he does his bhagti. However if you read my post again you will see that I meant his "views" or "vichaar" and others like him are not inline with gurmat and I showed just one particular point on this. However if I did upset anyone then I am sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Sachkandh is where the Bhagats brahmgyanis Gurus Sants who practice truth reside. When a soul there stops practicing and serving Truth, they no longer vibrate at the required frequency and are sent to lower realms. 

 

The frequency you vibrate at depends on your truth practice, the less u practice, the lower your vibration. We all go to the level we belong at.

 

On earth, our frequency and vibration determines which realm we connect with, whether it be a heaven or a hell realm. Hence you can live heaven on earth or hell on earth.

In the age of Kalyug, the psychology has more or less become collective due to people's attachment to each other and BS society. The collective psychology has become hell on earth where the majority of the population live a hellish psychology.  It is truly the blind leading the blind. 

People live in maya I.e jealousy and envy of each other, lust of each other, attachment to each other, ego and anger and selfish pride and greed. People slander backstab and fight with each other. People will act good to each other and gossip and act in maya behind closed doors. 

When you become a societal outcaste, shunning the expectations of society and you stop reacting in maya and start being positive and truthful, ie applying Gurbani to your life 100%, you detach from the rubbish and detach from the negativity and lift your vibration.

It takes one star to light up the sky which is why Gurbani tell us to follow the Satguru. The teachings of Gurbani/ Guru are the light of this age and applying it 100% we are able to release the bonds of societal BS and live in our True state.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 21/02/2012 at 1:40 PM, scooter said:

Can anyone explain me that is sachkhand a place like earth where singhs are gathered. I mean does people can see each other. Or its beyond explanantion. Is it like earth or sky or what. Does people move there or sit there. I remember one some singh show me some person who sometime go to sachkhand for kirtan. I don't know if e was right or not. Some having heard from mahapurush about that??

Your answer is here. Listen to it all, its amazing:

http://www.gurmatveechar.com/audios/Katha/02_Present_Day_Katha/Giani_Harbhajan_Singh_Dhudikey_(Vidyarthi_Sampardai_Bhindra)/Sri_Gurpartap_Sooraj_Parkash_Granth/Patshahi_01_-_Sri_Guru_Nanak_Dev_Ji/Giani.Harbhajan.Singh.(Dhudikey)--108.Nanak.Prakash.Katha.-.Purbaradh.Adhyai.72.-.Dhru.Parsang.mp3

After listening to this you will want to listen to next katha in the series, which is also about sachkhand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi

The kind of abrahamization of Sikhi is ludicrous LOL 

Sachkhand is not a physical place like heaven  , its an avastha you can say , a final state reached by devotees. 

Its a state where there's no duality , no sorrow or joy can affect you . Its like deep sleep , except you're aware. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2012 at 6:43 PM, Mat Pulo Rai said:

Osingh what do you mean that not everywhere is sachkand, are you trying to say there is a place where God doesnt not reside, i think you need to re-think that.

why ? the creation resides within the creator  , the creator is the superset whereas we are just a subset

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

The kind of abrahamization of Sikhi is ludicrous LOL 

There's a strange trend going on where when you don't agree with something, you don't reference Gurbani, Sikh history, theology, or Sikh saints. 

You just call it "Abrahamic", or alternatively "Brahministic".

2 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Sachkhand is not a physical place like heaven  , its an avastha you can say , a final state reached by devotees. 

Again, said with no reference whatsoever.

If you had bothered to read the excellent posts of @N30S1NGH here and here, you would realize that some Sikh saints believe Sachkhand to be a state, others a place.

In the end, the only way you'll reach Sachkhand (the place or the state) is through Naam Simran (mediation). 

So what's the point of fighting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
23 minutes ago, BhForce said:

There's a strange trend going on where when you don't agree with something, you don't reference Gurbani, Sikh history, theology, or Sikh saints. 

You just call it "Abrahamic", or alternatively "Brahministic".

Again, said with no reference whatsoever.

If you had bothered to read the excellent posts of @N30S1NGH here and here, you would realize that some Sikh saints believe Sachkhand to be a state, others a place.

In the end, the only way you'll reach Sachkhand (the place or the state) is through Naam Simran (mediation). 

So what's the point of fighting?

ok bro 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use