Jump to content

New Song With Humble The Poet


Only five
 Share

Recommended Posts

The character Harry Pannu in the song at 1 minute states that kirpans have gone old and the new era, which has changed, is about guns. Before these guys wrote this song, they should have found out that Satguru Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji Maharaj carried a gun himself, but gave the Kirpan as his gift to the Khalsa Panth at the first Amrit sanchar and never changed the kirpan, even though Satguru knew that guns existed and will get more advanced. Such ignorance in the Sikhs shows why we don't progess. These guys release this ignorant stuff, then the Khalsa Panth has to work twice as hard to show that a Kirpan has a higher meaning than just a weaponed. If these characters would have done their research for just 15 minutes they would have saved themselves from slandering Satguru Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji Maharaj.

I agree with Singh559 comment about Humble the poet. He used Sikhi to get to the top and then turned his back on the Guru by rapping in favor of partying, drugs, and lustful acts.

Many Sikhs say Sikhi is about being a learner. So what did these artist learn after making this song? If you want to learn in life, then first you have to have a proper teacher that knows what they are talking about. These characters traded in the Guru's wisdom for worldly fame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that has ANY ability to interpret a song knows that the entire thing is about the sad situation Punjabi Sikh youth are going through with the pressures of "modern" living against keeping true to their roots. It's BLATANTLY obvious that the 'controversial' lyrics that are being spoken of here are sung in a sarcastic, insulting tone about Punjabi gang violence and guns, WHICH IS a problem in the community. Obviously anyone that takes lyrics at the most simplistic face value are the SAME type of people that take everything they read so literally they become narrow, ardent, negative, and locked in their views. Then they come on a message board to spew venom against the artist without any remote knowledge of the actual message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are people for real?

Our Gurus may well have known about how the gun may have developed but they didnt have the manufacturing capabilities back then to make tens of thousands of machine pistols and assault rifles. It's not as if bladed weapons and guns are mutually exclusive either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody doesn't understand punjabi here. The song is promoting punjabi culture. Harry Pannu in his lyrics says the jatt have stopped producing desi alochol and started drinking alcohol as produced by the english, near the end of the song. Then the song comes to together when b magic says they tell us to change like the seasons, but stay rooted in the things we (punjabis) believe in. The beginning humble says change before you have too, time does not hestitate and if you hang on to old times then its the only sin. Then the next part is of Harry Pannu enforcing the idea that in this era the times have changed so switch from a Kirpan to guns. Next part is saying that punjabi boys used to be caring guys, still drinking alcohol, but now they have become womenizers. The song is promoting punjabi culture as to what it was and to accept the new things that time provides that does not make you leave punjabi culture. For these three, keeping a kirpan is part of old times, which can be changed. They are saying change is not bad if it's a postive move forward.

There is too much anger in people these days...for that i agree with the song. No understanding left in people anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Gurus knew what will happen in the future with technology (guns get better with tech), the Gurus are Akal Purakh themselves, but Akal Purakh blessed us with a kirpan as a Kakkar, even though guns were used by the Khalsa Panth in Satguru Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji Maharaj time. If the Gurus wanted, they could have eliminated all the enemies of the Khalsa Panth in a split second. But they stayed inside of Akal Purakh's Hukam. In the past Saints have offered to help the Gurus with their shakti, but the response was always it is Akal Purakh's Hukam for this to take place. Sant Baba Gurbachan Singh ji Maharaj, knew Sri Darbar Sahib would be attacked in 1984, but Sant ji did not go out of Akal Purakhs Hukam to stop the attack. The Sant's of Akal Purakh know the future and so does Satguru. But Satguru still blessed the Sikhs with a Kirpan as a Kakkar and never told us to change the Kakkar. Satguru has told us to keep shastar on us, but a shastar (gun or any other weaponed, even a sword) can never be referred to as a Kirpan. A Kirpan is only given to the Sikhs at Amrit Sanchar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use