Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Khalasthan86

Can One Be Shasterdhari Without Amrit?

18 posts in this topic

Vaheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa Vaheguroo Jee Kee Fateh

In Sikhi, is it permitted for one to be Shasterdhari

without Amrit?

As, I was listening to Kathaa by Sant Jarnail Singh Jee,

and He was mentioning become Shasterdhari.

but he didnt mention anything about being shasterdhari and Amritdhari.

dont get me wrong, i know sant jee said become amritdhari.

but can we be equipped with shasters if we're still not amritdhari???

Vaheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa Vaheguroo Jee Kee Fateh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An Amritdhari is supposed to be shasterdhari. Think of it this way. A cop has the right to carry firearms. Other citizens need permit and then have other restrictions as well. For the most part they won't be carrying their gun openly even if they have a permit/license for it. A cop however is in uniform and always wears it on the outside. Thats how I understand it. An Amritdhari has made a commitment and thus carries shasters. A non-Amritdhari has not. No one will stop a non-Amritdhari from carrying shasters, but he/she doesn't have that kind of responsibility the way an Amritdhari does.

Take Amrit and no one will ask you why you're wearing a shaster! :)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take Amrit

I Wish! :waheguru:

I just think i'm not that rehearsed in Rehat. :L:

So... Can I be Shasterdhari without Amritdhari? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can carry shastar, but you'll be like the brahmins that wear the sacred thread around their necks as a sign of high spirituality, but inside they are empty.

Read Mehtab Singh's post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can carry shastar, but you'll be like the brahmins that wear the sacred thread around their necks as a sign of high spirituality, but inside they are empty.

Read Mehtab Singh's post.

but aren't all Kakkars equal? :BL:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has any one ever used their shaster here to protect themselves or someone else?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but aren't all Kakkars equal? :BL:

Sure they are and some have more responsibility than others. Carrying the Kirpan has a higher responsibility. People that are wanting to take Amrit should be taking up the five kakkar before they take Amrit. The five kakkar are about taking the grace of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji Maharaj. You can wear, keep whatever kakkar you want without Guru Sahib's grace, but the person is still hollow. The grace comes first then the Kakkar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

having to take amrit before wearing shashtar is an old wives tale. Guru Ji does not limit self-defence or defence of weaker people, only to those who have taken amrit. Think about it.

Pir Buddhu Shah was not amritdhari, but was shastardhari, as well as his 500 mureeds. The Udasi SAnt who fought in Bhangani was not amritdhari, but was shastardhari.

At the time of 6th Guru, no-one took Khande ki pahul, but the AKal sena were shastardhari.

Too much superstition and Brahman thinking in Panth at this time.

and Guru Ji also tells us, :

Bina Kes Shastarnan na diya deedare...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

having to take amrit before wearing shashtar is an old wives tale. Guru Ji does not limit self-defence or defence of weaker people, only to those who have taken amrit. Think about it.

Pir Buddhu Shah was not amritdhari, but was shastardhari, as well as his 500 mureeds. The Udasi SAnt who fought in Bhangani was not amritdhari, but was shastardhari.

At the time of 6th Guru, no-one took Khande ki pahul, but the AKal sena were shastardhari.

Too much superstition and Brahman thinking in Panth at this time.

and Guru Ji also tells us, :

Bina Kes Shastarnan na diya deedare...

If you read the post carefully then Mehtab Singh and I have stated to the origional poster you can wear shastar without Amrit, but The Gurus Grace is the most important part. Gurbani says this over and over. And bringing up incidents when Khande da Amrit was not introduced is shooting in the dark. So those points are irrevelant. If you want to speak in those terms then why even believe in miri and piri when it was not introduced by Satguru Sri Guru Arjan Dev ji Maharaj.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

having to take amrit before wearing shashtar is an old wives tale. Guru Ji does not limit self-defence or defence of weaker people, only to those who have taken amrit. Think about it.

Pir Buddhu Shah was not amritdhari, but was shastardhari, as well as his 500 mureeds. The Udasi SAnt who fought in Bhangani was not amritdhari, but was shastardhari.

At the time of 6th Guru, no-one took Khande ki pahul, but the AKal sena were shastardhari.

Too much superstition and Brahman thinking in Panth at this time.

and Guru Ji also tells us, :

Bina Kes Shastarnan na diya deedare...

I clearly said, no one is going to sue you if you wear a shastar and haven't taken Amrit. Its the responsibility that varies. A non-Amritdhari will not hesitate to remove his/her shastar for whatever reason, an Amritdhari will NEVER remove it, unless ofcourse its the unfortunate removal while boarding an airplane, after which an Amritdhari would do Ardas and put it back on. Some GurSikhs don't consume anything as long as there is no kirpan on them during their flight. Yes your examples are valid, but remember those were times of war when both Amritdharis and non-Amritdharis were fighting against a tyrant regime. Sant Jarnail Singh Jee Khalsa Bhindranwale also asked all Sikhs to have weapons to protect themselves from a tyrant regime. We are talking about 2 different scenarios.

I am not sure which country you are from. If you are a non-Amritdhari in a western country which respects Sikhs, please feel free to carry an AK-47 next time you go to purchase groceries. It will become very clear who is a Brahman and who isn't :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before the onset of the modern world i.e. post WW2 - it was common for people of all cultures to be armed to one extent or another. In many cultures this is still the case - but mostly in old world cultures or rural areas - be it Europe, Middle East, Nepal, Indonesia etc etc.

Even in the US one has a right to carry arms dependant on the state laws etc.

In the UK however, only 'amritdhari' Sikhs have the right to carry 'blades' in the form of the kirpan etc.

If you want to be armed - there are many legal ways of doing that. If you want to be armed with kakaar i.e. kara/kirpan - then it is a matter of your consiousness - as these are gifts from Dasam Patshah to his Singh Khalsa.

If you are worried about being attacked etc, then in all honesty - kakaars are not your saviour (although nothing would make me happier to see another Singh take Khande de Pahul).

Real defence comes from knowledge - vidya - of fighting. The real weapon is therefore you. Shastar are just an extension of our limbs.

For a Singh - the association with Shastar is more complex and deep - as all Singhs are "supposed" to have vidya of yudh. Sadly today we have a whole generation of youths who have no idea about Khalsa Dharma - and those that look the part, seldom have any realistic/usable knowledge of being able to use their kara or kirpan (or themselves for that matter) in a fight/weapons/multiple situation. Sadly, in most cases - their kara and kirpan are simply cheaply bought, low quality symbols rather than expensive/quality/usable shastar. Then we have a new growing generation of antique collectors - who likewise a simply creating mini museums - but do not invest time, money or dedication in learning real combat and therefore being able to use their collectables.

If you want to defend yourself - learn a real combat art which uses simple, efficient, devastating movements - which can be transposed from any inanimate object to open hands. That way you will be a formidable/deadly opponent for anyone - even armed with a ball point pen or credit card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So those points are irrevelant.

Yes your examples are valid...

Nothing like conformity in the Panth is there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing like conformity in the Panth is there?

You need to read more carefully Singh. Look at what is being called irrevelant and why. Unity is there, but you cant see it. Your Brahman comment is being called irrevelant and dont you see how you thought like a brahman in your own post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My mamaji asked a Nihung Singh who showed us his collection of antique shaster, he also made shaster. His reply was simple, he said even if you haven't taken amrit, you can still be shastertari. If you can't protect someone else, you can at least protect yourself.

Either way, our goal is to take Amrit and adopt a GurSikhi life...Can we just agree there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in my opinion, being shastardhari involves knowing how to use the weapons efficienntly in battle, which only comes through immense training, rather than just wearing them.

For answering your question, yes, anyone can be shastarsdhari, anyone can carry them, but a gursikh takes it one step further. He/she is a sant-sipahi, with b ot miri and piri, not just the shastar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in my opinion, being shastardhari involves knowing how to use the weapons efficienntly in battle, which only comes through immense training, rather than just wearing them.

For answering your question, yes, anyone can be shastarsdhari, anyone can carry them, but a gursikh takes it one step further. He/she is a sant-sipahi, with b ot miri and piri, not just the shastar.

Being AMritdhari will put your mind into an advantageous position as you will have mental discipline over your five chor which can tip you over in battle to being reckless and therefore dangerous to yourself . Being a shasterdhari surely means being the best warrior you can be ...and I believe that history has shown that having amrit is an definite plus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This Mother Quit Her Job To Teach Her 8 Year-Old How To Do Chemical-free Farming. Here’s Why  Pallavi Goel 4:47 PM 25 APR, 2017 In a world where most couples aspire to educate their children in international schools so that they can get the best education and well-paying jobs in the future, there is also a couple who is ready to do anything that it takes to make their son a successful farmer.  To be able to fulfill this dream, Gurbaksh Singh’s parents have not only moved to a village, they’ve done a lot more than that. His mother, Chanchal Kaur, has quit her job as a senior matron in Railways that paid her 90,000 rupees every month. His father, Rajendra Singh, a cashier in the Railways has also taken a long break from his job and plans to quit soon. The family was inspired to take this decision after being moved by the sufferings of Rajendra Singh’s sister. She fell victim to cancer because of chemical fertilizers used in the production of cereals and vegetables. Terming the hard-hitting incidence as a “U-turn” in their lives, the family has pledged to do chemical-free farming all through their lives. Rajendra Singh and Chanchal Kaur, hailing from Ajmer, Rajasthan, now want their son to be a farmer so that he can grow organic vegetables and grains and prevent people from getting cancer. Now they have bought two bigha land in Asrawad, which is known for being a fertile land for cultivation. The family, however, has no prior connection with their new village. Gurbaksh Singh has been enrolled in the Central School of Asrawad. The 8-year-old has already started training in farming. The family has also started constructing their house which will be erected with the use of completely natural material. Solar energy will be used for the purpose of cooking and electricity. Source - http://topyaps.com/mother-quit-job-son-farming
    • Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
      Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji What I can suggest from advice is (if you are able) to go to any Sri Gurdwara Sahib ji, and do seva such as washing dishes, and do jaap at the same time. Doing seva with jaap gives countless sukhs. I was watching a jaap session from a Sri Gurdwara Sahib live from home, and the parcharak singh ji said that there is no need to go anywhere else for sukh, and that if we do seva at a Sri Gurdwara Sahib ji for 40 days or so while doing jaap then even our lines on our hands will change and become pavitr. If you also practice Sri Sukhmani Sahib ji daily that is by far amazing.
    • Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
      Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji I get what you mean, but why should we care if Islam is enough? If people want to practice through ethical means, then they should be allowed to practice it.. As for the final prophet title or w/e, I don`t think we can simply judge it because who knows what the truth regarding Muhammad ji was actually like. Better safe than sorry when it comes to judging ancient religious leaders, rather lets spend our time praising our own Sri Guru Sahib jis. If bhagats have followers & they are not Sikh, then let them live as well.. They will come to know the truth through kirpa of God.
    • Yeah   I really enjoy reading the threads on there, some of the translations and thoughts are very deep.
    • Yes it does matter if he was a muslim or not, this might come as a shock to you but his bani is within Guru Granth Sahib Ji. IF he was a muslim then logic begs that the path of Islam is enough to reach God because a muslim's writings are included within Gurbani. That also means that the Quran could be considered equal to Gurbani and wait for it, Muhammad was the final prophet of the lord and no one else after him counts. Do you get the conundrum now?    New comers will point to Bhagat Farid and say "he was a muslim so its ok for me to do X,Y,Z" then they'll take it a step further and say that Bhgat Namdev was a follower of Vishnu (for the record he wasn't) and start venerating his idols. Do you get the little issue? The whole point of this thread is to show people that Farid Ji was a Sikh, I don't get why your panties are in a knot over it.