Jump to content

Sacrifice At Hazur Sahib – Myth & Truth


Only five
 Share

Recommended Posts

1. The arguement that vegetables/grain/fruit is the same as meat does not hold.

2. The jhatka way does not solve anything.

3. It proves that meat eaters have a double standard for meat and vegetables, but with the same tongue say both are the same.

[/size][/font]

VahegurooJiKaKhalsaVahegurooJiKiFateh!

Great stuff, many thanks to you for the article.

VahegurooJiKaKhalsaVahegurooJiKiFateh!

I e-mailed Nanak Singh Nishter aswell about my finds, but he hasn't responded back yet(hasn't been long since i did it). I'll be waiting for what he has to say about it. It's something we can't ignore. Well, I believe i have an idea in which direction this finds point aswell do others that looked into it, but let's see what Mr. Nishter has to say about it.

And do if you wish present it to anyone else that is in support of Jhatka as done today to read it and see his/her response to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In the shabad I pointed out in original post, where the sugar cane is being crushed it has already been pulled out of the ground. How come Guru Nanak Dev ji is telling everyone to look at the horror of what we are doing to the sugar cane when it is being crushed.

So your theory is not even going with Gurbani. Yet meat eaters use this shabad to say look the sugar cane is suffering in pain. Here is the whole shabad so the rest can see what we are talking about.

Chatanga, by your saying the sugar cane died when it was cut, but by Guru Nanak Dev ji it dies after it is cut out and placed in the wooden rollers. Why else would it cry when it is being crushed.

do you think that the sugarcane is actually crying out or is Guru Ji using these words for an antreev message?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"JO SABH MEH EK KHUDAI KAHAT HO TO KYO MURGI MAARE"

(Parbhati KABIR JI at ANG 1350)

Singh, I real don't know why your presenting this tuk. because surely I know I did not present this shabad or tuk.

If you want someones take on what this means, then the meat eaters are saying this shabad is talking about the Muslim way of killing the animals as a sacrifice to God and it will purify the animal. They say Bhagat Kabir ji is question and calling their ritual wrong.

In the shabad I pointed out in original post, where the sugar cane is being crushed it has already been pulled out of the ground. How come Guru Nanak Dev ji is telling everyone to look at the horror of what we are doing to the sugar cane when it is being crushed.

So your theory is not even going with Gurbani. Yet meat eaters use this shabad to say look the sugar cane is suffering in pain. Here is the whole shabad so the rest can see what we are talking about.

Chatanga, by your saying the sugar cane died when it was cut, but by Guru Nanak Dev ji it dies after it is cut out and placed in the wooden rollers. Why else would it cry when it is being crushed.

do you think that the sugarcane is actually crying out or is Guru Ji using these words for an antreev message?

Well I took the intrepretation from your meat eating brothers. And they say the shabad is telling us the sugar cane feels pain. Does it actually cry out like an animal will while being crushed. NO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਮਃ ੧ ॥

ਵੇਖੁ ਜਿ ਮਿਠਾ ਕਟਿਆ ਕਟਿ ਕੁਟਿ ਬਧਾ ਪਾਇ ॥ ਖੁੰਢਾ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਰਖਿ ਕੈ ਦੇਨਿ ਸੁ ਮਲ ਸਜਾਇ ॥

ਰਸੁ ਕਸੁ ਟਟਰਿ ਪਾਈਐ ਤਪੈ ਤੈ ਵਿਲਲਾਇ ॥ ਭੀ ਸੋ ਫੋਗੁ ਸਮਾਲੀਐ ਦਿਚੈ ਅਗਿ ਜਾਲਾਇ ॥

ਨਾਨਕ ਮਿਠੈ ਪਤਰੀਐ ਵੇਖਹੁ ਲੋਕਾ ਆਇ ॥੨॥ {ਪੰਨਾ 143}

Here GURU NANAK DEV JI MAHARAJ is talking about Sugarcane and

is telling us that we first cut the Sugarcane(KAT KUT BADHA PAYE)

than crush in crusher(KHUNDA ANDER RAKH KE DEN SU MAL SAJAYE)and

there after the juice is boiled in the big pan and than it cries

(TAPPE TE VILLAYE)and again its remains are used as fuel to boil

juice of itself.

But here the Sugarcane is symbol of our selfishness or false ego or/

and MAYA DA CIRCLE around,us made by ourselves.And when our sugarcane

of ego/selfishness is crushed and its juice is boiled means we are

suffering from uncontrolled anger,we cry ,burning in the fire of anger.

Bhul chuk khima,Waheguru ji ka Khalsa Waheguru ji ki fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ਮਃ ੧ ॥

ਵੇਖੁ ਜਿ ਮਿਠਾ ਕਟਿਆ ਕਟਿ ਕੁਟਿ ਬਧਾ ਪਾਇ ॥ ਖੁੰਢਾ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਰਖਿ ਕੈ ਦੇਨਿ ਸੁ ਮਲ ਸਜਾਇ ॥

ਰਸੁ ਕਸੁ ਟਟਰਿ ਪਾਈਐ ਤਪੈ ਤੈ ਵਿਲਲਾਇ ॥ ਭੀ ਸੋ ਫੋਗੁ ਸਮਾਲੀਐ ਦਿਚੈ ਅਗਿ ਜਾਲਾਇ ॥

ਨਾਨਕ ਮਿਠੈ ਪਤਰੀਐ ਵੇਖਹੁ ਲੋਕਾ ਆਇ ॥੨॥ {ਪੰਨਾ 143}

Here GURU NANAK DEV JI MAHARAJ is talking about Sugarcane and

is telling us that we first cut the Sugarcane(KAT KUT BADHA PAYE)

than crush in crusher(KHUNDA ANDER RAKH KE DEN SU MAL SAJAYE)and

there after the juice is boiled in the big pan and than it cries

(TAPPE TE VILLAYE)and again its remains are used as fuel to boil

juice of itself.

But here the Sugarcane is symbol of our selfishness or false ego or/

and MAYA DA CIRCLE around,us made by ourselves.And when our sugarcane

of ego/selfishness is crushed and its juice is boiled means we are

suffering from uncontrolled anger,we cry ,burning in the fire of anger.

Bhul chuk khima,Waheguru ji ka Khalsa Waheguru ji ki fateh.

Yes, Singh the metaphor is understood. What I was pointing out is that meat eaters also say the sugar cane is suffering. This shabad is both, it has a literal meaning and the metaphorical meaning.

Since the meat eaters know where I am going with this, they will fight to death now to prove that the sugar cane doesn't suffer, going back on their first interpetation to be right. In other words they will flip, flop like a fish out of water, just to eat meat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use