Jump to content

It Guru Ji's Bana Not Nihang Bana!


Recommended Posts

they both the samething as the tenth guru was a nihang so it is a nihang bana and it is guru's bana what a stupid tread! By the way i havent bothered to read any previous reply to this just thought i would put my 2p worth in!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't use the amritworld site as being totally right, the views are biased.

I also found this on the sarbloh site lol (from the Akali Nihangs section under sanatan sikhs)

I have censored out parts that would be offensive to this website lol :

The Sanatan Sikhs - The Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa

Page 4 of 4

Nangs cont'd

A further issue that has to be highlighted is that ALL those Sikhs who are not Nihangs by action, tradition, attitude or the wisdom they possess, but, instead dress up as Nihangs to mislead people are also considered Nangs.

Many such fakes now exist and have convinced people they are Nihang Singhs. However, they are but fools, deceiving themselves, and those around them.

There are also many man-made personality cults such as the (censored), self-proclaimed Sants (saints), and their followers, that have adopted the Akali Nihang Singh uniform and (wrongly) claimed it as their own. This is a feeble attempt to appeal to people to gain new recruits. They in the most part do not even understand the origins of the uniform let alone its significance.

Some such groups have even accused the Akali Nihang Khalsa of not being true to history in order to keep the limelight away from their own hypocrisy and cult status.

Even many militant, fundamentalist, fanatic groups that have nothing to do with the Sanatan Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa, such as the (censored) who are the militant wing of the (censored), have also adopted this same image of the Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa. The followers of such movements are frequently depicted adorning the Akali Nihang uniform.

These same individuals insult and ridicule the very knowledge that brings about the uniform, heritage and traditions themselves. This section has caused an uproar from the groups guilty of being Nangs. However, this is inevitable as the truth will only hurt those individuals who are living a life entwined with hypocrisy, lies and confusion.

In the eyes of the Sanatan Sikhs, and especially the Akali Nihang Singh Khalsa, these people are in fact seen as even lower than Nangs, as they insult the very wisdom itself.

These personality cults, and self-proclaimed Sants are now sadly gaining the most members, both in India, and around the world under various names and guises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Other than Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee (where you state Guroo Jee is not referring to himself) are any of these accounts, that do refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung of the time period of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Gobind Singh ji was an Akali NIHANG

Can i have proof that Guroo Gobind Singh Jee was a Nihung ie written accounts of the time of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720) that actually refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung or give Guroo Jee the title Akali

Nihungs also refer to Guroo Nanak Dev Jee as 'Akali'...does this mean that Guroo Nanak Dev Jee is a Nihung too?

anyone?

guru gobind singh ji used nihang in at two places in sri dasam granth 1 in chandi di war for the army of durga other in bachiter natak hussanis battle where he called his fauj as nihangs ... and nihang for guru gobind singh is used not in one but many granths such as gurubilas patshahi 10 where its clearly said about ponta sahibs jung that nihang leading nihangs ie guru gobind singh ji leading his fauj !!!

and akali word came into being officially for guru sahiban and his fauj ever since akal bunga was made ...

Other than Sri Dasam Granth Sahib Jee (where you state Guroo Jee is not referring to himself) are any of these accounts, that do refer to Guroo Jee as a Nihung of the time period of Guroo Jee or shortly after (upto 1720)?

no replies?

am i to assume that there is no evidence to prove that Guroo was a Nihung?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use