Jump to content

It Guru Ji's Bana Not Nihang Bana!


Recommended Posts

Fatehi Jio

Im Not Trying To Offend Anyone But This Needs To Be Raised Up!

On Facebook I Have Found A Group Called ''AKJ have taken the nihang bana''.

Its NOT Nihang Bana Its Guru Ji's Bana Just To Clarify To Everyone. This Group Is Saying AKJ Have Taken Nihang Bana And This Is Not True!

The Group Also Says About AKJ's Dastar!

It Is Posted On This Group:

The Bana was given to us by Guru Gobind Singh Ji. During Guru Gobind Singh Ji's Guruship, the Moghals were persecuting all those who didn't follow their religion. Some Sikhs were hiding their identity and denying their relationship with the Guru. When a Sikh wears a Bana, they are representing the Guru and they cannot hide their identity from anyone. This is the gift of the Bana.

Oh and Waheguru Singh, AKJ is not a clan, I don't know what gives you or anyone else that idea. Shame on you for writing such blasphemy about such people who simply love to get together and simply do kirtan. There is no need for anyone to know who is AKJ or who is Nihang, that is because no one is AKJ or Nihang, we are Sikhs first and that's what the supposed "confused youth" (which I have yet to meet) need to know.

Im Sorry But This Is Basically Putting AKJ Down! Is There Anyway We Can Get Rid Of This Group?

Pul Chuk Maaf Karni

Fateh Jio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no its GUROO JI's bana, his sikhs are his nihangs, i.e. ALL OF US, all sikhs, taksalis, akj, etc. have the right to dress like their father.

superiority complex nihangs need to get over trying to be special from everyone else.

great post "! Gupt !"

Laughing_RoflSmileyLJ.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KKV using Akhalee Nihang Baba Hardeesh Singh Jee Velling Vahleh's account

Woah...Bhajee/Bhenjee you almost speeching all of that as if that one of the members here on SS wrote the article thing on "Facebook" ( :rolleyes: ).

First of all Nihangs are sikk okay so thats fact number one ( :happy: ), number two WHO CARES man??? I do understand the point your making that how bascially AKJ's are being put down due to what type of Chohlaa they wear. BUT thats like saying is it fair to have AKJ's claim that the TYPE of Keerthan they do has to be called AKJ Keerthan...?? (I'm not quoting just example) I aint going to lie, if somebody said that Taksalee's or Nihangs are copying someone or something I'd be pee'd off iswell (so don't worry am not gonna pretend that I'd be calm) BUT end of the day the society runs on labels. As soon as someone walks into the Dharbaar Saahb, we ALL look and see what type of Dhasthaar someone's wearing, what colour it is, what Shasthar they've brought with them today, or what type of Kirpaan their wearing, what type of Chohlaa their wearing, what colour it is etc etc....its all been turned into fashion - don't lie you know how long we ALL spend infront of the mirror in the morning trying tie our Dhasthaar and how it has to look PERFECT....moral is we created labels now we have to live with our own mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could we BE any more caste ridden?

looks like Jathas are the NEW and IMPROVED, NEVER BEFORE SEEN "castes" of sikhi!!!!

:sunsingh: :older_singh: :singh1: :smile-kaur:

a religion founded on the prinicples of IK - ONE - UN - UNO is now showing how "well" it is adhering to this prinicple :rolleyes:

Well done........... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nihung bana? Seriously, one of the stupidest things I've heard.

What's so "nihung" about it, I think singhs fail to understand what the word actually means and like JustME bhainjee said "Could we BE any more caste ridden?"

We've labeled everything and everyone we see to the point of CLOTHES. This is taksali chola, or AKJ dastar, or taksali kirpan, or nihung bana, take a step back hear yourself, you're only fooling yourself.

By labeling you are not creating unity in the panth but are disuniting the panth by labeling such things to belong to one group or another instead of belonging them to the khalsaa panth like Guru Sahib did. There weren't such labels in the times of guru sahib. Guru pitajee's teachings have always been One God, One Guru, and One Khalsa Panth.

Its our MANMAT and stupidity to label our beloved gursikhs to the extent of their clothing to belong to a specific group instead of to the khalsa panth. This is the trend in the youth today and even though we want the panth to unite we are creating barriers among each other by putting these labels.

Bhul chuk muaf karnee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use