Jump to content

Did Bhai Bala Exist?


Recommended Posts

From different sources:

Bhai Bala's own name is not traceable in any other Janam Sakhis. In Bhai Gurdas's eleventh //, the names of all the known Sikhs up to that time have been mentioned but there is no direct reference to the name Bala. Bhai Mani Singh has, in his Bhagat Ratnawali, repeated nearly the same list but Bhai Bala, who could have narrated the Janam Sakhi as such, does not exist there either. There are a number of other anomalies, which Dr.Kirpal Singh has explicated in his Punjabi work `Janam Sakhi Parampara.'

Contemplating on all the evidence available, one becomes sceptical to accept the authenticity of Bhai Bala's Janam Sakhi, and doubt prevails if there had ever been any person in the name of Bala as Guru Nanak's companion.

Source

In reality, Bhai Bala never existed. He was a fictious character pushed into our history to destroy us. It was hard for me to believe at first, but it is the reality.

There are several flaws in his version of Janam Sakhi about Sri Guru Nakan Dev Ji which he claims that Sri Guru Angad Dev Ji asked him to write.

In his Janam Sakhi, he clamis that Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji was a great Hindu, but lower in spirituality than Bhgat Kabir and Hundal. Also he tries to prove that Guru Nanak Dev Ji did not come to the world to liberate the world, but because of his own karma and liberate himself. There are countless other anti-gurmat sakhis and things written in his janam sakhi that are hard to believe.

Also, the language of this Janam Sakhi is very very moderen and is not of the period of Sri Guru Angad Dev Ji, which proves that someone wrote this Sakhi longgggg after by creating a fictious charactyer, Bala and linked him with Guru Arjan Dev Ji and Guru Nanak Dev Ji's companion. In that Sakhi, Bala also writes tha whatever he is writing is all truth becuase all the things he is writing he has seen them with his eyes becauas he was with Guru Nanak Dev Ji ALL the time, which is totally wrong, becuase if that were true then why didn't Bhai Gurdas Ji mention his name in his Baani. Bhai Sahib mentioned only Bhai Mardana as Guru Nanak Dev Ji's companion.

There are sooo many other points... To find out more please read 'Katik Ke Vaisakh' by Karam Singh Historian.

Source

Pyare jio, most people believe Bhai Bala ji is an invention of the hindu right-wing groups. Sahib Siri Guru Nanak dev ji was only accompanied by Bhai Mardana ji. I cannot think of one sakhie of Sahib Siri Guru Nanak dev ji which has bhai Bala ji in it. They are all with Bhai Mardana ji only.

Both hindus and muslims claimed Guru ji as their own. Gurbani is clear that Guru ji belonged only to Akaal.

However to counter-act Guru ji being claimed as a muslim, hindus created Bhai Bala ji in old texts. However most scholars and Gursikhs now agree there is no prove to his existence.

So lets start a healthy discussion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Singh, where do you find this gandh?

I guess whoever wrote those 'arguments' has never read Suraj Parkash or Bhai Bala's Janam Sakhis for themselves.

There's nothing to discuss. It's a pointless topic, those who don't want to see the truth won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bhai Bala Janamsakhi has been proven WRONG!!

Best post of this forum i have seen till date was on this subject (by a veer called karku4life):

There seems to be much confusion on this forum on the topic of whether Bhai Bala was a real person or not. This is not surprising since this same confusion exists in the Sikh Panth as a whole. We here are all some fortunate tho that we are all currently students or were students recently and have been taught the value of critical analysis. For that is the purpose of higher education. To give the individual the tools of rational thought and deductive reasongin and be able to apply them in every walk of their life. This skill that they possess is what makes university/college graduates more sought after by companies (not merely a paper diploma).

Even today many people are so strongly supportive and die hard believers in the existence of Bhai Bala that they will openly use his name in their katha and sakhis within gurdwaras and if anyone dares to even challenge them or question the validity of these sakhis they label them as traitors to the panth and that they are tryin to change history. This is a very immature attitude. A sikh is defined by this very virtue that they do not live in blind faith. That a sikh cannot be fooled by anyone and will not believe anything they hear just cuz so and so said it. A Sikh always analyzes every situation on his own and then using the refernce guide of gurbani to ascertain wether it is true or not. So let us do the same on this topic

WIth regards to dicussion on the topic of Bhai Bala, an excellent overview of the subject matter is given in Prof Sahib Singhs book, "Adhi Bir Barai". There is an english translation available and i hihgly encourage everyone to try and read it at some point in time. The book discusses a large number of false sakhis, banis, compositions, myths that have been associated with the Gurus and employs a very calm natured, clear and direct, scientific approach to analyzing each of them. After reading the book there should be no doubt as to the origin, motive and authenticity of all these fake, spurious additions to Sikh history.

Below is the section from this book dealing with Bhai Bala.

The Janamsakhi of Bhai Bala.

The name of Bhai Bala is so popular that it is doubtful if any other Sikh is popular to that extent. Both learned and lay men believe that Bhai Bala was a Sikh of Guru Nanak Dev; he was also a resident of Talwandi; during the Gurus long tours, he was ever with the Guru. After Guru Nanak Dev's demise, Guru Angad Dev called him from Talwandi. He lived with the Guru and helped in writing the life history of Guru Nanak Dev, which book is called ``Janamsakhi of Bhai Bala.'' Everywhere in Punjab, in all gurdwaras, people daily hear the stories from this Janamsakhi.

But it is most surprising that such a renowned Sikh of Guru Nanak Dev, called Bhai Bala, was totally ignored by the accepted topmost scholar poet of Sikhism, named Bhai Gurdas Bhalla, who in his 11th //, while giving the list of the devotees of Guru Nanak Dev, omitted the name of Bhai Bala! Bhai Gurdas even included the name of Nawab Daulat Khan Lodi, as the devotee of Guru Nanak Dev, but not of Bhai Bata. In the first //, Bhai Gurdas very briefly gave an account of Guru Nanak Dev's life. While describing the Third Missionary Tour of Guru Nanak Dev for visiting Mecca, Madina, Baghdad and other places, Bhai Gurdas states ``Baba went to Baghdad and stayed there at the outskirts of the City. There was one God Man, the Baba, and the second one was Minstrel Mardana.''

How strange it is! Every Sikh considers Bala as the great devotee of Guru Nanak Dev and the life history of the Guru as told by him was most authentic; and that this record was the oldest one. On the other hand the great Sikh historian, Karam Singh, in his book ``Katiak or Baisakh'', has stated the reality of Bala's Janamsakhi. By writing this book, Karam Singh has rendered singular service to the cause of Sikhism. Every literate Sikh should read this book and appreciate the real service rendered by him. By giving a number of references from the book of Bhai Baja's Janamsakhi, he wrote at the end

With this history, one can say without fear that this Janamsakhi was made at the end of Guru Gobind Singh's time. It could not have been written earlier than Guru Gobind Singh's time.

We give below some of the factors that led Sardar Karam Singh to draw the above conclusion. We will give references from the second edition of the book ``Katak or Baisakh'', which was published in 1932 and contains 270 pages --

1. Page 197 : Names of certain selected cities and villages are changed from time to time. ``Eminabad'' is a new name of the city, which was previously known as Saidpur. Although the new name of this city had been decided, at the time of Guru Nanak Dev himself, but became current only after it was registered in official records. Before Ain-e-Akbari, the name of this city was famous as Saidpur. Even Mohd. Quasim Farishta, who lived during the time of Akbar, mentions the name of Saidpur. The Puratan Janam Sakhi written in 1691 Bikrami (1634 A.D) makes mention of Saidpur. But the Janamsakhi of Bhai Bala, stated to be the oldest, makes mention of ``Eminabad''

2. Page 198: In Puratan Janamsakhi, wherever there was a mention of names of Bhai Jhanda and Bhai Lalo, word ``badhi'' was also used with their names. The word ``badhi'' is a Punjabi word. The word ``tarkhan'' was derived from the Balochi word ``darkhan''. When the Baloch people came to Punjab, being Muslims, they had a voice in the administration. As a result of their use of word ``darkhan'' for a carpenter, the Punjabis also began to use the word ``tarkhan'' for carpenter, instead of ``badhi''. This was much later development. In Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi word used is ``tarkhan'' -- this Janamsakhi apparently was not written during Guru Angad Dev's time.

3. Page 199 : The following Slok appears in Bala's Janamsakhi purported to have been uttered by Guru Nanak Dev during discussion with Pandit Braham Das (Kashmiri)

gur miliyai man rahasiyai, lion vuthai dharan see gar. ....

But this Slok is of Sri Guru Amar Das Ji.

4. Page 201 : When Guru Nanak Dev went to Medina, there he had discussion with the Quazis. The Guru was stated to have uttered the following Shabad

alahu agam khudayi bande.........

But this is Guru Arjan Dev's Shabad.

5. Page 210 : When Guru Nanak Dev in his First Tour, visited the country of devas, there Raja Devdoot became the Sikh of the Guru. During the discussion that followed between them, it has been stated: ``Guru Nanak said, `O Bhai Devloot, I appoint you a Masand of this place.'' But the Masand System came into existence from the time of Guru Arjan Dev. Before that time, this word had never been used by the Sikhs.

6. Page 210 : According to Bhai Bala, Mardana got the Rabab from a nomadic, and asked the Guru about Gurmukhi instruments. The Guru replied: ``O Mardana, Rabab and Dhadd are the Sikh instruments of music.'' But ``Dhadd'' was introduced by Guru Hargobind for singing Vars and other marshal tunes. During the earlier times, it was not used by the Sikhs.

The Real Author of Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi

Possibility of Confusion

Guru Nanak Dev's demise took place in 1539A.D. The author of Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi showed to the people that Guru Angad immediately on becoming the Guru called for Bhai Bala, who started dictating this Janamsakhi. Sardar Karam Singh historian has proved that this book was written after 1750 Bikrami (1693 A.D). The author of this Janamsakhi had in his mind some ulterior motives. The author wanted to create confusion in Sikhs. Guru Nanak Dev's Date of Birth

Sardar Karam Singh's book ``Kartik or Baisakh'' has clarified the confusion created by this Janamsakhi. He writes that all the old Janamsakhis had mentioned the date of Guru Nanak's Birth on Baisakh Sudi 3 (April 15), but Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi without any reason stated that the Guru was born on the Full Moon Day of the month of Kartik. It created confusion in Sikhs, which still continues. The old Janamsakhis mention the date of birth as Baisakh Sudi 3 (April 15), while we continue to celebrate the day on the Full Moon Day in Kartik.

Regarding Baba Handal

Karam Singh refers to the stories as given in Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi, relating to the departure for abode of God, story of discussion with Bhagat Dhrooh, and the story of visit to Kandhar in all these stories Guru Nanak Dev was downgraded and Baba Handal was greatly exalted. They have lifted Baba Handal to such an extent that he had reached the Court of God. Karam Singh

writes on page 238, of his book, as under –

The contents of Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi are clear. It is all in praise of Baba Handal and condemnation of Guru Nanak Dev. It is for this reason, the author of Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi can be none else but a Niranjania. But there are two things to bear in mind: firstly, to consider Sri Kabir higher than Guru Nanak Dev, secondly, Handal claiming to be the Sikh Brother of the Guru in Treta Yuga. Many people think that the Janamsakhi of Bhai Bala, which contains much praise of Sri Kabir, is a trick of the Kabir Panthis. But this is not true. In the Janamsakhi of Niranjanias, it has been clearly admitted that Kabir was the greatest of all the Bhagats, except for Baba Handal. Therefore, to suspect that the Kabir Pathis had their hand in it, is a baseless argument. The second point is all the more surprising. In this Janamsakhi, it is written that in Treta Yuga, the Guru was aservant of Raja Janak, used to worship images and tell lies. But in this account it has been stated that in Treta Yuga, the Guru and Handal were Sikh Brothers and both were the Masands of Raja Janak. From this it is clear that those who had written this Janamsakhi, never realised their mistake. The author of the Janamsakhi tied up both the ends one (Handal) was raised sky high and the other (Guru Nanak Dev) according to their mean thoughts, lowered to greatest depth of the underworld.

Why we turned to this side?

We were in search of the source which caused inclusion of spurious compositions into the copies of handwritten Holy Books. Who did this mischief and how did it happen? In this search, we came across Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi, which was written 20 25 years after the Martyrdom of Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur in 1675 A.D. In this Janamsakhi, the date of birth of Guru Nanak Dev has been given differently from the previous ones and it is in this book that the Guru has been ridiculed and insulted to the extreme. The chief of the Niranjania sect, Baba Handal has been greatly praised and has been shown of much higher status than Guru Nanak Dev. Sardar Karam Singh reached the conclusion that Bhai Bala's Janamsakhi was written at the initiative of the Niranjania sect. But to keep the Sikhs in confusion, they were informed that this was written in the presence of Sri Guru Angad Dev Ji at the dictation of Bhai Bala.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

huh???

i wanted to know if their are any counter-arguements to prove it wrong..

obviously none could be mathable to those i mentioned....

anyways anyone with arguments is welcome

From many sources here are facts why Bala did not exist:

*Bala Janam Sakhi is not written by 'Bala' and much time after Guru Ji. This doesn't prove that he didn't exist but disproves the one who claim that as a source that Bala existed.

*Bhai Gurdas Ji didn't mention Bala in his vaar 11 he mentioned the names of Guru Nanak Dev jis devotees, even mentioned Nawab Daulat Khan Lodi but no sign of Bala. Bhai Mardana is mentioned.. But not Bala.

*No sign of descendants.

*As believed he was Sandhu from Nankana Sahib... But there werent Sandhus in Nankana Sahib back then.

& many more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The so called bhai Balla never existed. The facts have been presented by both Prof Sahib Singh jee and Karam Singh historian. The posts by Veer SunnybondSingh jee has presented good summarys of these writers books.

Ive read the book Adi Bir bare by Prof Sahib Singh jee and if you cant read Punjabi, you can get the translation of the book in English.

As for gandh, well maybe you should read the janamsakhi and see that its the creation of Baba Handalis. Prof Sahib Singh jee believes baba Handalis created this book because baba Handal is shown as being greater than Guru Nanak Dev jee. The worst thing is that according to this so called Bala, Baba Handal has to explain spiritual things to Guru Nanak Dev jee. Handalis did everything to destroy Sikhi and after the times of Guru Gobind Singh jee joined hands with the Afghans. They were the ones who would kill the Sikhs and obtain money when they presented the heads of Sikhs in Lahore.

Baba Handalis still exist in Punjab and will never stop in there mission to destroy Sikhi. the main dera is just of the GTR road going from Kartarpur to Amritsar near the Baba Bakala turning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow... veerji, i didnt knew they still existed..

shortly, baba handalis were to the sikhs in 17th and 18th century what nirankaris, noormehalias, sacha saudias, bhaniarawalas, etc are to us today....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At Khadoor Sahib, you can visit:

Gurdwara Sri Tapiana Sahib :-

This place is very sacred as First Master Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji sang holy hymns along with Bhai Bala Ji & Bhai Mardana Ji. It is at this place that Sri Guru Angad Dev Ji got written Janam Sakhi of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

Memorial of Bhai Bala Ji :-

This memorial is situated in circumbulation(parkarma) of Gurdwara Tapiana Sahib where Sri Guru Angad Dev Ji performed his last rites with his own hands.

Read it for yourself, and check if it actually contains any of the stuff mentioned in previous posts.

Sunnybondsingh, you have Sant Jarnail Singh ji's photo as your avatar, you might want to listen to some of their Katha.

P.S. shouldn't you be spending more time studying than on the internet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use