Jump to content

Sikh Marriage Act


sikh_assasin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sikh marriage act

The Sikh marriage act was in action before 1947 the British implemented it around the 19th century however when the Hindu government came into power in 1947 they got rid of it and implemented the Hindu marriage act and also included the Sikh nation as Hindus in the Indian constitution. This is why our so called leaders such as BADAL and TULSI today do not want us to have a Sikh marriage act because they know that if they were to implement the Sikh marriage act today they would also have to amend the Indian constitution to recognise the Sikh nation as a separate nation. Thereby any so called Sikh leader who apposes the Sikh marriage act is a Indian government puppet and should not be trusted

Mr Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because badal is a clever politician. he is just "sikh enough" to get sikh votes and smart enough to keep hindu votes.

sadly, asserting sikh identity in India is seen as anti-national in india, thus the strained hindu-sikh relations, which everyone is in denial about.

there is a serious disconnect with what the sikhs are saying and what the hindu majority is hearing or blocking out. when in 1984 sant sipahi jarnail singh wanted equal rights for sikhs, the hindu majority was told that he wants khalistan.

when sikhs demanded justice for punjab police extra judicial killings, the world was told that Pakistan is trying to destroy india.

when sikhs want the constitution changed to refelct their religious sovereignty, people are told that terrorism is trying to revive itself.

it's time the indian nation takes a dose of reality and wake up and smell the tea. the sikhs are trying to say something, again.

peace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also wanted to bring to the attention of the sangat that India has over 70 registered holy cities yet not one of those is a Sikh city not even Amritsar. Due to the Sikhs not being recognised we have no rights to a holy city. The Sikh population of India is under major invasion yet people are simply sitting back I feel as a nation we should be a little more pro active and maybe think outside the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use