Jump to content

HOw important is Taking Amrit for a Sikh??


Pheena
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Akaal108
Can you be liberated without have taken Amrit meaning being an AmritDhari Sikh?  Can a SahijDhari Sikh be liberated??  What guarantee is there that the AmritDhari sikh will be liberated??

Off course sejhadhari sikh can be liberated. But cannot be liberated with guroo's sahiban.

Reason guroo sahiba gave us hakum to enroll in the spirtual school first which is takin amrit.

Now why did i say sejhadhari sikhi can be liberated??

Sejhahdari sikh can be liberated with his murshad. Murshad is someone who has met with god. Inorder to meet god ..you need to find someone who have met god.

Look at bhagat kabir, farid, bhagat namdev, ravidasa etc in sggs. Those two didnt took amrit or anything. They were liberated with lord.

Pheena, there are different ways(discliplines) to merge with vaheguroo. Khalsa way of life is one and most effective one i have came across.. Look at all the bhramgyanis, mahapursh we had throughout the sikh history. They all took amrit(enrollment in the spirtual school first) then got liberated by doing seeva and naam kaamiayie. I m not saying there hasnt been any sejhadhari sikh who didnt get liberated. There were uhdasis who get liberated with their god - baba sri chand maharaj son of guroo nanak sahib ji.

I shall direct you to listen to the suleman ghost tape in urdu. Then you will find out what sikhi

is all about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..........because the panj pyare tell u on the day of amrit that you are liberated from the cycle of life and death?

btw if u break ur rehat then u fall back in and have to take amrit again. its not as easy as one would think in keeping the rehat and taking amrit with a pure heart.

bhai gurdas says one is only a sikh of the guru once he is baptised.

once u do alot of paath n stick to the basic rehat and arent doin any of the 4 bad things its almost certain that u will get a strong yearning to take amrit anyway.

there is a rehatnama that says those who pretend to be/call themselves sikh but dont take amrit and follow the code of conduct are moorakhs (fools).......thus amrit is ESSENTIAL for a sikh

saackhand (highest level of bliss) is only achieved by htose who are extremely spiritually advanced, and for that amrit is an obvious prerequisite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Akaal108
saackhand (highest level of bliss) is only achieved by htose who are extremely spiritually advanced, and for that amrit is an obvious prerequisite.

Khalsa soulja,

are you doubting that bhagat kabir, farid, namdev, siri-chand, ravidas didnt go to sachkhand because they didnt took amrit??

Thats a stupidest thing i ever heard man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Akaal108

so khalsa soulja you are saying bhagat kabir, farid, namdev, siri-chand, ravidas were not sikhs(gurmukhs) ???

Also what if is he born sikh???? That does not mean is he sikhi is it??? Also its up to him to acccept khalsa way of life or other way which is (Inorder to met god, you have to find who have met god already) to choose???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Akaal108
no, im saying that they werent sikhs.

gurmukh and sikh is not the same thing.

bhagat kabeer existed b4 guruji, how could he have been his disciple :umm:

that basic stuff man. i thought u knew wat a sikh was.

are you just arguing for the sake of it, or do u have anything clever 2 say?

Whats the difference between sikh and khalsa ??

Answer this first.

If you say they are same. Then we threw man...not debating with you anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Akaal108
"one is not a sikh of the guru until he is blessed with baptism"

Ok this is where charan amrit comes in....

Did u know charan amrit is still valid by udhasis??

The above quote of sggs is universal message not for khalsa but for every human being out there.

This is what bhagat kabir, farid did ..they did charan amrit from their murshad. and became liberated. Just because guroo gobind singh ji created khalsa "khandaie dii phaul" amrit does not mean charan amrit becomes invalid. But it means "khandaie dii phaul " amrit is much easier way to get liberated.

One is easier than another. Indeed, they both work. It all depends on the individual choice what the person is comfortable with...if the person is comfortable with charan amrit of his guroo/saint/murshad then he will do ....if the person is comfortable with khanda battaie da amrit...love for 10 guroo's and follow rehat to be liberated...naam dhaan, ishaan...seeva etc....

Its all depends on the individual choice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use