This is not your "humble" opinion.It is your wrong opinion.Allow me to correct you.
You refered to Gurbani from SGGS.Let me tell you that in this Gurbani the word mat is used.
Mat, matu (mamma-tatta) = stop, do not, have not.
Mati (mamma-tatta-sihari/bihari) = advice, instruction.
In Mahan Kosh by Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, mat, matu and mati have been given accurate meanings.
In reference to Mahan Kosh:
Mat, mat(u) = stop, do not, have not
Mat(i) = way of thinking, advice, practice
So the following Pavittar Bani of Satguru is like this:
1. Bed Kateb kahahu Mat Jhute, Jhuta Jo Na Bicharai. (p.1350 SGGS)
Do not say the Veda and Kateb are false, false are they who do not contemplate.
r>So mat, mat(u) does mean "stop, do not, have not".You think you are more correct than Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha?
You think Satguru would call Veda false, when Satguru Nanak has said:
Gurmukh(i) Naadan, Gurmukh Vedan, Gurmukh Rahia Samai.
The Guru's Word is the Naad, the Guru's Word is the Veda, the Guru's Word is all pervasive. (Jap Ji Sahib)
So you are doing a grevious mistake in mis-translating and misleading Sikh youth.
Why would Satguru tell His Sikh to call the Veda and Kateb false?What kind of a Satguru is that who preaches hatred?You are doing beizzati of Satguru by misinterpreting His Bani.
Am I wrong? :T: