Other than prove that many Sikh guys are dunce when it comes to debate. How did the guy make the brother look dumb?
People should REALLY be careful when using Janam Sakhis as historical evidence. I bet the guy said something like, "if he moved Mecca, how comes no one else noticed?" Muslims place a big thing on miracles like that as evidence of God's presence. Had Guru Nanak really did that, I think many of the people there would have recognised him as a holy man.
Dr Niak didn’t make the brother look dumb he did it himself.
I have scene many of Dr Niak talks. I have always wanted a Sikh to ask him a question, and when he did I was cringing.
The Singh pushed in front of people to get to the mic, causing a commotion. Rushed to come out with this.
He was told moving of the Mecca or any other building is Un-scientific, Dr Niak then said lets just suppose it did happen it would be recorded by Islamic historians.
These mircales are always connected with Religous founders in Religion to proove they are men of God.
If Guru Nanak did move the mecca, he would have documented in his writings. Guru Nanak also was against myth mircales.
The verse which is NOT in the SGGS ...goes along something like the whole of mecca was spining.
If anything was spinning it was the peoples mind with whom Guru Ji had debate with when he gave them his answer, "to point my feet to a place where God is not"