Jump to content

KhalistanYouth

Members
  • Posts

    193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by KhalistanYouth

  1. On 1/15/2022 at 5:36 PM, GurjantGnostic said:

    What goes around come around. That whole generation is going to wreck itself banging like that. Messy. Low level. 

     

     Punjabis are organized crime and international the top guys are making millions they aren’t low level at all. They have kilos lol

  2. On 6/18/2018 at 10:33 PM, CanadianSingh said:

    I don't know why there is suffering in this cold world, I see many innocent people dying even though they were religiously devout to God such as the 1984 Anti Sikh Riots. Why would God or Whaeguru do such a heinous thing to cause suffering and hell such as the 1984 Anti Sikh riots.

    The suffering is what made us strong.

    It's what made the Khalsa what it is, it's what made us fight against oppression and tyranny.

    It's why Sikhs are filled with the bravery and courage of lions, and why we aren't afraid when it comes to battle or war.

  3. 2 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

    Makes me feel real proud..........lol

    They aren't sikhs but they admire their religion, kinda twisted.

    Due to this though, sikhs aren't being targeted for hate-crimes etc because they know repercussions will happen.

    Some black youth were making fun of a elderly sikh man, and a couple days later all the sikh youth clowned the black youth on camera and slapped him up.

  4. On 6/29/2020 at 2:17 PM, dharamyudh said:

    Reading more about this so-called royal family, you can see so much bakwas. No wonder the empire fell. In my opinion, the Akal Takht and Khalsa should have ruled the whole thing. I always found it weird how we had royal family within a Sikh Raj. It should've been the Khalsa. If everyone had worked together, as a collective, and with the right gursikhs leading, the possibilities could've been endless. You would still have leaders like Ranjit Singh, Hari Singh Nalwa and so on. Still could modernize and all that, it was all possible. If the Khalsa was to rule, Panjab would probably become a Sikh majority, which in itself could've changed the course of history. We really had to rely on a raja, leading a Khalsa Raj when he himself wasn't that religious. No wonder the Nihangs clashed with him, and you can clearly see what happened after his death. Treachery, betrayal, and a thirst for power. Once a prominent monarch is killed/dies, the whole thing can basically crumble due to this thirst. However, the Khalsa does not crumble. Regardless of the situation, the Khalsa always remains intact.

    I still got respect for Maharaja Ranjit Singh, as stated before, he has done a lot. United the misls at a young age and established some sort of Sikh Raj not seen since the rise of Banda Singh Bahadur and the Singhs. But, he was more like your average king. Alcohol, dancers, all of that. I can't get down with that at all. 

    I don't think the Khalsa would've been able to sustain against foreign threats, it's why Absolutism is needed at times, however too many people were greedy and power hungry within Ranjit singh's empire, and he didn't keep the British in check.

  5. 19 minutes ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:

    Has anyone heard that maharaja ranjit singh might've killed his own mother at suspicion of illicit affair after death of maha singh? 

    And rani Jindan weakening khalsa army in revenge of her brother nahar singhs death, thus assuring our loss in the sikh Anglo wars? 

    Why couldnt ranjit singh just keep upto 3 or 4 wives like a normal king lol? Many of his presumed heirs have been rumored to be sited by someone else? And why the hell would he drink wine with crushed Pearl's? 

    Was this the grandson of sardar charhat singh who chased abdali, or descendent of sardar Budh singh one of pyare who blessed sardar Kapur singh virk with nawabi? This man is so frustrating? 

    Also please remember that most of these western-sources are biased.

    The Maharaja's life was written by a guy that left his service and went on to serve the Afghans, I believe Dost Khan? was the leader of the Afghans during this time, anyways he lost and most likely wrote a anti-Sikh propagated view point.

  6. On 6/28/2020 at 1:30 AM, MisterrSingh said:

    Another instance when a cultural practice that was unequivocally forbidden by the Gurus was perpetuated without remorse by the very people who should have shunned it. What exactly was "Sikh" about this kingdom aside from superficial surface traits and adornments? The more I read about it, the more it pi55es me off. 

    Do you really think a empire could exist that will 100% follow the teachings of a "X" Religion?

    If there was a Empire that was truly Sikh, it wouldn't last.

    Indian kingdoms resort to brutality and violence to retain control, Maharaja Ranjit Singh knew this and created an modernized empire with Vicious foreign generals as governors, it'd be the only way for a kingdom to last.

    The Sikh Empire, is only sikh in name, infact majority of our troops were muslim, and greatness did come from our Empire however it wasn't sikh, Maharaja Ranjit Singh wanted this Empire for his family not for the panth otherwise he would've listened to  Akali Phula Singh when it came to succession. (Making the successor someone that was capable, not his drug-addicted and inexperienced children.)  The Maharaja was also a alcoholic, but he did respect Sikhi when it came to being punished for his sins. 

  7. On 3/9/2021 at 2:57 PM, californiasardar1 said:

    I have noticed that many (maybe even a majority) of Canadian Sikhs try to speak the way American Blacks are stereotyped to speak. This is also true for many "famous" Canadian Sikhs (think of "superwoman" and other various youtube "stars") .

     

    Why do they do this? American Sikhs know how ridiculous and absurd it would look for them to go around talking in such a way. I don't understand why Canadians do this.

     

    Maybe because Canada doesn't have any real "hoods," they think attempting to sound like you are from the "hood" is cool, and they know nobody will call them out on it?

    Maybe Canadians are in general so used to not having their own identity and living vicariously through others that they think it's natural to shamelessly imitate other people?

    Maybe most Canadians are just corny?

    "Canada doesn't have any real hoods"

    Canada is filled with hoods and gang based violence since the 1980s, there are many crip and blood sets throughout this city, a lot of shootings and deaths as well, the homicide rate surpassed New York and London, 500+ shootings, however the murder rate is low since the shooters can't aim.

    Punjabis in Canada are usually from low-income communities, and many of us are gangsters in Canada, and are into drug-trafficking, if you look into BC, Surrey, and Abbotsford you'll find many Indo-Canadian Organized Crime groups that also work with black street gangs throughout the city, infact crime is dominated by indians in Canada.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Canadian_organized_crime

    https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/vancouver-news/six-wanted-38-charges-laid-in-drug-trafficking-investigation-related-to-brothers-keepers-3763250

    https://vancouversun.com/news/task-force-targeting-brothers-keepers-gang-has-reduced-violence-police-say

    https://vancouversun.com/news/crime/fatal-flashpoint-gurmit-dhaks-2010-murder-ignited-a-gang-war-thats-still-raging

    https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/more-than-25-people-charged-in-ontario-after-international-drug-trafficking-network-dismantled-by-police-1.5393133

     

  8. On 2/11/2021 at 11:40 PM, Guest Singh said:

    I’ve notice a lot of my cousins in Canada can’t speak Punjabi let alone read it.  They are too old to go the the local Punjabi school offered in the gurdwara.  They don’t come from religious families and I feel really bad as I think their chances of connecting with Sikhi are pretty slim due to the language barrier.  A few have expressed regret that they weren’t encouraged to learn at a young age and their parents spoke only English at home.  Any suggestions? 
     

    They can connect with Sikhi in English, there is a youtube channel called "Basics of Sikhi" the videos done by Jagraj Singh  (Rest in peace) was done very well, in english too, and he himself was born in the UK and used to be a Mona.

  9. On 2/11/2021 at 11:40 PM, Guest Singh said:

    I’ve notice a lot of my cousins in Canada can’t speak Punjabi let alone read it.  They are too old to go the the local Punjabi school offered in the gurdwara.  They don’t come from religious families and I feel really bad as I think their chances of connecting with Sikhi are pretty slim due to the language barrier.  A few have expressed regret that they weren’t encouraged to learn at a young age and their parents spoke only English at home.  Any suggestions? 
     

    Send them to India and have them live there for some months with relatives, that's how I learned, cant read it but you can speak it and hear it.

  10. 9 hours ago, imhosingh said:

    I'm going to try and be impartial here. Did the RSS/BJP force Sikhs to turn to liquer, cut their hair etc? Up until the 90s they (the RSS and BJP) were under pressure by the Congress/centrists, who ran things. The Congress tried to attack them too. But unlike us, they maintained their unity and played the long game. I think if we had more unity and learnt from past mistakes we would be a more formidable force. They are nationalists ...we are nationalists...they are united ..we are not 

    So where exactly are you getting "Sikhs cutting their hair and drinking liquor" from?

    I haven't read up all the replies on this thread, but I haven't seen anyone say they're forcing us to drink... Instead I see us commenting about their propaganda, and how they want a repeat of 1984.

    Sikhs were always united, they just abused our generosity and used it against us, like how all of our allies always ended up betraying us.

    The RSS did get involved in the whole  Khalistan issue, and hijacking the entire movement into full-fledged terrorism but that's a whole different subject.

  11. 1 hour ago, Arsh1469 said:

    On the bottom part your friend is wrong as the Vedas do mention it. The Vedas are kind of like Sikhi as they say there is one god. Are all others are demi Gods. Mordern Hinduism is a bunch of religious as one. 

    The Puranas put the focus more on other Demi Gods. The Puranas are not bad as he says they are more about Demi Gods. I don't think Durga/Chandi is mentioned in the Vedas. The Vedas were more about philosophy while the Puranas are stories and epics. Also Indra is not a person but a title given to a elected person. Atleast from what I have heard and Read.

    Well, they believe that there are Avatars that represents different aspects of god, the main three also known as the Trimvurti is Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, and they have always existed I believe, and all these other gods are their avatars, or something along those lines, and there's something about Amrita and the nectar of immortality where the demons and devas wanted "immortality" I think it was mentioned in the puranas, I'm also not sure about where the goddesses came from.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use