-
Posts
193 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Posts posted by KhalistanYouth
-
-
We need sikh groups that’ll catch these predators and beat their <banned word filter activated> so they stop targeting us.
2 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
15 hours ago, justasking said:one thing i want to bring forward is tht right now in canada they are focusing alot on the blacks they are setting up funds for the black candians entrepreneurs and other fundings but i never remember any sort of help to brown communities
Brown communities are rich in B.C. They still sell drugs and kill each other because of revenge , continuing their family business (drug trade) or wanting to be cool and live a faster life
3 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Like I said before, start encouraging martial arts training as in boxing, mma, etc and gym weight training. Punjabis in Canada had to adopt the gangster image to stop other communities from <banned word filter activated> with us.And now whenever a sikh gets pressed by a racist, the racist gets dealt with especially at a school, by monas. We need the actual sikhs that follow sikhi to stop being so passive and also become a warrior instead of a nerdy incel
5 -
On 6/18/2018 at 10:33 PM, CanadianSingh said:
I don't know why there is suffering in this cold world, I see many innocent people dying even though they were religiously devout to God such as the 1984 Anti Sikh Riots. Why would God or Whaeguru do such a heinous thing to cause suffering and hell such as the 1984 Anti Sikh riots.
The suffering is what made us strong.
It's what made the Khalsa what it is, it's what made us fight against oppression and tyranny.
It's why Sikhs are filled with the bravery and courage of lions, and why we aren't afraid when it comes to battle or war.
2 -
2 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:
Makes me feel real proud..........lol
They aren't sikhs but they admire their religion, kinda twisted.
Due to this though, sikhs aren't being targeted for hate-crimes etc because they know repercussions will happen.
Some black youth were making fun of a elderly sikh man, and a couple days later all the sikh youth clowned the black youth on camera and slapped him up.
2 -
Just now, dallysingh101 said:
Makes me feel real proud..........lol
A lot of the punjabi men glamorize the lifestyle and youth get drawn into it, they look up to Bindy Johal as a hero and this influences their actions, including punjabi-gangster rap, and toronto culture interwined with Jatt culture or pride.
2 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Just now, intrigued said:What if we made Guru Sahib the head of an empire
People would try and twist the message to their own interpretation, and motives.
It could be used in a court-like example though, "law of the lands"
3 -
Just now, NaamTiharoJoJape said:
Lol try rewording the first sentence
Purity and empires don't coexist.
2 -
On 6/29/2020 at 2:17 PM, dharamyudh said:
Reading more about this so-called royal family, you can see so much bakwas. No wonder the empire fell. In my opinion, the Akal Takht and Khalsa should have ruled the whole thing. I always found it weird how we had royal family within a Sikh Raj. It should've been the Khalsa. If everyone had worked together, as a collective, and with the right gursikhs leading, the possibilities could've been endless. You would still have leaders like Ranjit Singh, Hari Singh Nalwa and so on. Still could modernize and all that, it was all possible. If the Khalsa was to rule, Panjab would probably become a Sikh majority, which in itself could've changed the course of history. We really had to rely on a raja, leading a Khalsa Raj when he himself wasn't that religious. No wonder the Nihangs clashed with him, and you can clearly see what happened after his death. Treachery, betrayal, and a thirst for power. Once a prominent monarch is killed/dies, the whole thing can basically crumble due to this thirst. However, the Khalsa does not crumble. Regardless of the situation, the Khalsa always remains intact.
I still got respect for Maharaja Ranjit Singh, as stated before, he has done a lot. United the misls at a young age and established some sort of Sikh Raj not seen since the rise of Banda Singh Bahadur and the Singhs. But, he was more like your average king. Alcohol, dancers, all of that. I can't get down with that at all.
I don't think the Khalsa would've been able to sustain against foreign threats, it's why Absolutism is needed at times, however too many people were greedy and power hungry within Ranjit singh's empire, and he didn't keep the British in check.
1 -
19 minutes ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:
Has anyone heard that maharaja ranjit singh might've killed his own mother at suspicion of illicit affair after death of maha singh?
And rani Jindan weakening khalsa army in revenge of her brother nahar singhs death, thus assuring our loss in the sikh Anglo wars?
Why couldnt ranjit singh just keep upto 3 or 4 wives like a normal king lol? Many of his presumed heirs have been rumored to be sited by someone else? And why the hell would he drink wine with crushed Pearl's?
Was this the grandson of sardar charhat singh who chased abdali, or descendent of sardar Budh singh one of pyare who blessed sardar Kapur singh virk with nawabi? This man is so frustrating?
Also please remember that most of these western-sources are biased.
The Maharaja's life was written by a guy that left his service and went on to serve the Afghans, I believe Dost Khan? was the leader of the Afghans during this time, anyways he lost and most likely wrote a anti-Sikh propagated view point.
2 -
On 6/28/2020 at 1:30 AM, MisterrSingh said:
Another instance when a cultural practice that was unequivocally forbidden by the Gurus was perpetuated without remorse by the very people who should have shunned it. What exactly was "Sikh" about this kingdom aside from superficial surface traits and adornments? The more I read about it, the more it pi55es me off.
Do you really think a empire could exist that will 100% follow the teachings of a "X" Religion?
If there was a Empire that was truly Sikh, it wouldn't last.
Indian kingdoms resort to brutality and violence to retain control, Maharaja Ranjit Singh knew this and created an modernized empire with Vicious foreign generals as governors, it'd be the only way for a kingdom to last.
The Sikh Empire, is only sikh in name, infact majority of our troops were muslim, and greatness did come from our Empire however it wasn't sikh, Maharaja Ranjit Singh wanted this Empire for his family not for the panth otherwise he would've listened to Akali Phula Singh when it came to succession. (Making the successor someone that was capable, not his drug-addicted and inexperienced children.) The Maharaja was also a alcoholic, but he did respect Sikhi when it came to being punished for his sins.
2 -
On 3/9/2021 at 2:57 PM, californiasardar1 said:
I have noticed that many (maybe even a majority) of Canadian Sikhs try to speak the way American Blacks are stereotyped to speak. This is also true for many "famous" Canadian Sikhs (think of "superwoman" and other various youtube "stars") .
Why do they do this? American Sikhs know how ridiculous and absurd it would look for them to go around talking in such a way. I don't understand why Canadians do this.
Maybe because Canada doesn't have any real "hoods," they think attempting to sound like you are from the "hood" is cool, and they know nobody will call them out on it?
Maybe Canadians are in general so used to not having their own identity and living vicariously through others that they think it's natural to shamelessly imitate other people?
Maybe most Canadians are just corny?
"Canada doesn't have any real hoods"
Canada is filled with hoods and gang based violence since the 1980s, there are many crip and blood sets throughout this city, a lot of shootings and deaths as well, the homicide rate surpassed New York and London, 500+ shootings, however the murder rate is low since the shooters can't aim.
Punjabis in Canada are usually from low-income communities, and many of us are gangsters in Canada, and are into drug-trafficking, if you look into BC, Surrey, and Abbotsford you'll find many Indo-Canadian Organized Crime groups that also work with black street gangs throughout the city, infact crime is dominated by indians in Canada.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Canadian_organized_crime
1 -
On 2/11/2021 at 11:40 PM, Guest Singh said:
I’ve notice a lot of my cousins in Canada can’t speak Punjabi let alone read it. They are too old to go the the local Punjabi school offered in the gurdwara. They don’t come from religious families and I feel really bad as I think their chances of connecting with Sikhi are pretty slim due to the language barrier. A few have expressed regret that they weren’t encouraged to learn at a young age and their parents spoke only English at home. Any suggestions?
They can connect with Sikhi in English, there is a youtube channel called "Basics of Sikhi" the videos done by Jagraj Singh (Rest in peace) was done very well, in english too, and he himself was born in the UK and used to be a Mona.
2 -
On 2/11/2021 at 11:40 PM, Guest Singh said:
I’ve notice a lot of my cousins in Canada can’t speak Punjabi let alone read it. They are too old to go the the local Punjabi school offered in the gurdwara. They don’t come from religious families and I feel really bad as I think their chances of connecting with Sikhi are pretty slim due to the language barrier. A few have expressed regret that they weren’t encouraged to learn at a young age and their parents spoke only English at home. Any suggestions?
Send them to India and have them live there for some months with relatives, that's how I learned, cant read it but you can speak it and hear it.
2 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 2/12/2021 at 12:40 AM, AjeetSingh2019 said:I feel sad that we have only past glories to revel onto
what about today and our future ?????
Get super rich and start rebuilding our homeland in Punjab, into a new Dubai however don't forget about the corrupt government that will try to exploit our improvements on our motherland, until now condition yourself and those around you to be warriors, learn how to fight in many ways as you can, and learn how to survive in the wilderness, the future generation must be strong and must be able to adapt to any situation, and must be able to survive, the Sikhs in the past have learned combat, and learned how to live off the land, and learned about battle as well, that is a vital aspect we are missing.
4 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
More tactics they'll try to use.
1. Early Paintings of Guruji's had Tilaks on their forehead making them Hindu
Now what they fail to understand is that this practice was stopped by the 6th guru, and completely ended with the formation of the Khalsa in 1699, where we officially got our "guidelines" per say, and the five K's, they also fail to acknowledge that our Guru's literally denied being Hindu or Muslim... Which is why you can only find paintings of Nanak, and our first five Guru's with Tilak, now the funny thing is they'll use these paintings as fact but deny our primary sources for our historical events.... Hypocritical? Also they seem to be very bipolar, some of them will deny us being Hindu and call us "plagarism" and said we have abandoned Dharma as soon as we stopped worshipping Hindu gods, and others will try to call us apart of Hinduism.
2. Hindu Gods/Goddess and Imagery
They will try to say that we believe in Hindu Gods, but they don't realize the fact that we don't see them as Gods, correct me if I'm wrong, but I read somewhere that it was said that once they started calling themselves "Gods" they grew in ego, and corrupted their mission? and that God can create thousands of Krishna's as tiny as ants, or something along those lines, stating that Krishna was basically insignificant to the actual creator (If you can find the exact quote, reply here.) They also fail to realize that we believe in Akal Purakh not those 33 million "gods" they have, and we don't Idol-worship either.
They may bring up the fact the Hindu goddess Durga was on the Sikh empire standard, however from what I read it can't be confirmed whether that flag was for a Hindu-regiment or for the entire empire, and having Durga on it doesn't mean you believe in Durga as your deity, many indians use them as a source of inspiration, similar to the Chand used by Nihangs which also has a different meaning to what these Hindu's who don't bother to do research may think.
They will bring up "Sects" such as the Udasi or Bandai Sikhs.
They will then bring up Udasi or Bandai Sikhs but completely fails to understand why they have been cut off, (20th cent for Udasi's, and Bandai Sikhs which was after Banda Bahadur's death whom was loyal follower of Guruji himself, rejoined the Tat Khalsa in it's entirety leaving behind the many customs Banda had for his followers while he was alive, after his death is when they tried to make him the 11th guru and create "Bandai Khalsa" they will also call him a Hindu even though he took amrit alongside his wife, and accepted his new name, and even after his followers created their own sect you can say, they still had the name "Sikh" in it instead of "Bandai Hindus")
3. Guru Tegh Bahadur's Sacrfiice.
They will try to either call it a myth and ignore the many sources, or they'll say "He didn't save Hindu's, those were Kashmiri Pandits." You can probably understand by now that they're pretty slow.
4. "McSikhs, SPGC Singhs!"
If you literally counter their point with any historical fact, or source they will resort to calling you a fake McSikh that supports the SPGC, or they'll call you a Muslim lover.
5. They will deny any history that makes Hinduism looks weak or evil.
Hindus converting to Islam like cowards? Nope didn't happen.
Rajputs selling their daughters to persians? Nope.
Hindu's being invaded for basically like 500 years by muslim and arabs and turks? Nope.
Hindu's becoming slaves aka Indentured servants in the Carribbean by the British Raj? Nope.
Hindu's being seen as a lesser race instead of a martial race? Nope.
Hindu's oppressing other religions such as Islam and Sikhs in their many religious riots? Nope, they'll say that they haven't started it, which maybe true in some cases however that doesn't warrant for the entire nation to kill random muslim babies over 1 event in 1 state, committed by only a few people, it's okay though their logic is that if 1 person from that group commits something bad, it's okay to go out and kill everyone belonging to that community, including children that have no idea on whats going on.
6. KHALISTAN!
You are a "Khalistan Terrorist" because you proved a RW Hindu wrong, congrats.
Maybe if they seen my username on this website they'd have a point, but it's clear they don't see us as equals so they shouldn't be so surprised they created a division among Hindu and Sikhs especially between the Youth and to Sikhs outside of India, try your best to "reason" with them and educate the truth, considering how effective their propaganda was to rally the RW hindus on the internet to villianzie our community, however remember.
"All modes of redressing the wrong having failed, raising of sword is pious and just"
If I made any mistakes, quote this and correct me because I wrote this in a rush.
6 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
19 hours ago, Shaheed4life said:Veerji how did you get the info that it is him?
I posted the twitter that linked him, also he follows and reposts the same memes by the account and also has the same BIO as one of his other accounts, which said "New York"
Now I have some rumors, one is that he's from UP not NYC, and another on twitter stating that they sent emails to his company and that the company isn't happy with him, he also blocked me on instagram after I dmed him so that confirms my suspicions, either way it seems like the Twitter-Singhs & Kaurs have dealt with him already, and that this person keeps creating the same accounts, so I think someone is trying to file a police report on him, (In India, because that's where he's actually from, according to what I read on Twitter.)
3 -
I found the main account, of the person that has been doing Beadbi
This is him.
https://twitter.com/nav_tk/status/1358590893826146304/photo/1
2 -
18 hours ago, Tamansingh123 said:
battle of jamrud was a sikh victory. afghans couldnt take the fortress back
Agreed, I was just copy and pasting what it said.
1 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 2/7/2021 at 2:32 PM, puzzled said:Hari Singh Nalwa took Amrit at the age of 10 and was presented with 5 shashtars, including a talwar and teer. After taking Amrit he became Hari Singh. At the age of 14 he killed a tiger with his sword, though the tiger managed to kill his horse. Hari Singh then got the name Nalwa. King Nal was a king from the Mahabharat era who killed a tiger with his hands, so Maharaja Ranjit Singh gave him the name Nal-wa, the "wa" being as in wa/wow. Hari Singh Nalwa was recruited as a bodyguard in the Lahore Darbar and soon after was given the title Sardar along with other Singhs for their contributions and achievements. He was also made commander of a small army. Around the same time he made his first victory with the conquest of Kasur.
All of this within just a few years.
Hari Singh Nalwa apparently ripped the tigers mouth open with his hands, he was also known to be the general patton of india, I think he spoke seven languages and offered to the the translator for Maharaja Ranjit Singh, he was also vital in the Sikh conquests of Afghanistan, in which he would make the men dress like women to spare their lives, he was a great strategician and had great battle prowess, Akali Phula Singh was another Sikh that was great during the empire, he even advised Maharaja Ranjit Singh that his childern are basically useless and that he should instead make the successor, one of his generals saying that the Sikh empire is for the people, however of course Maharaja Ranjit Singh didn't do that, leading to the incompetent successors after him (Yet we were still able to do well in the Anglo-sikh wars until of course the Dogras betrayed us) Also I think Hari Singh Nalwa was the first person to actually conquer the Pathans until his eventual death in battle.
" Though the Sikhs were totally outnumbered, presence of Hari Singh Nalwa put the Afghan army into panic. In the melee, Hari Singh Nalwa was grievously wounded. Before he died, he told his lieutenant not to let the news of his death out till the arrival of reinforcements, which is what he did. While the Afghans knew that Hari Singh had been wounded, they waited for over a week doing nothing, till the news of his death was confirmed. The Afghans withdrew after witnessing Nalwa’s body hung outside the fort. Hari Singh Nalwa had not only defended Jamrud and Peshawar, but had prevented the Afghans from ravaging the entire north-west frontier, in turn was not able to invade Afghanistan himself. The loss of Hari Singh Nalwa was irreparable and this Sikh defeat was costly for that precise reason."
3 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 2/9/2021 at 3:24 PM, MisterrSingh said:To any brothers and sisters on Twitter who have the time to do so, screenshot every single genocide-and-rape threatening Tweet made by these BJP / RSS supporters, and compile them into one single image / document. In the middle, scaled slightly bigger than the other Tweets, place Kangana Ranaut's Tweet that encourages genocide and destruction of Sikhs.
When these people claim India has never been hostile towards Sikhs and that our claims of them attempting to wipe us out are fantasies, present this particular document that lays bare their true depraved and bloodthirsty cravings.
This is how you play the propaganda war. But be quick incase they delete their Tweets and claim innocence.
I agree, everyone please do this, we need to basically make 1 big post and make it available for other accounts to repost across social media platforms, so we can shed light on the truth.
4 -
9 hours ago, imhosingh said:
I'm going to try and be impartial here. Did the RSS/BJP force Sikhs to turn to liquer, cut their hair etc? Up until the 90s they (the RSS and BJP) were under pressure by the Congress/centrists, who ran things. The Congress tried to attack them too. But unlike us, they maintained their unity and played the long game. I think if we had more unity and learnt from past mistakes we would be a more formidable force. They are nationalists ...we are nationalists...they are united ..we are not
So where exactly are you getting "Sikhs cutting their hair and drinking liquor" from?
I haven't read up all the replies on this thread, but I haven't seen anyone say they're forcing us to drink... Instead I see us commenting about their propaganda, and how they want a repeat of 1984.
Sikhs were always united, they just abused our generosity and used it against us, like how all of our allies always ended up betraying us.
The RSS did get involved in the whole Khalistan issue, and hijacking the entire movement into full-fledged terrorism but that's a whole different subject.
1 -
1 hour ago, Arsh1469 said:
On the bottom part your friend is wrong as the Vedas do mention it. The Vedas are kind of like Sikhi as they say there is one god. Are all others are demi Gods. Mordern Hinduism is a bunch of religious as one.
The Puranas put the focus more on other Demi Gods. The Puranas are not bad as he says they are more about Demi Gods. I don't think Durga/Chandi is mentioned in the Vedas. The Vedas were more about philosophy while the Puranas are stories and epics. Also Indra is not a person but a title given to a elected person. Atleast from what I have heard and Read.
Well, they believe that there are Avatars that represents different aspects of god, the main three also known as the Trimvurti is Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, and they have always existed I believe, and all these other gods are their avatars, or something along those lines, and there's something about Amrita and the nectar of immortality where the demons and devas wanted "immortality" I think it was mentioned in the puranas, I'm also not sure about where the goddesses came from.
0 -
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:My Vedic friend says hinduism is a later imposition on india. He said modern day hinduism is based upon puranas and except lip service no hindu in India actually reveres vedas for what they're. He said Vedic god's like agni vayu Indra are not even worshipped anymore in India. Rather Indra which is highest god in vedas is treated almost villain like in puranas. He said Vishnu and Shiva cults ruined the Vedic religion.
He also said Vedic religion doesn't believe in rebirth and theory of karma either. He is dead against notion of rebirths . Rather believes dead ones go to their ancestors .
Hinduism is a generalization, when you look into the hindu religion, there is a variety of beliefs, some of them worship other deities as their main gods, and so on forth, the vedic religion was vastly different back then, and even now there is closed practices where only people born into it can practice that certain form of hinduism, so yeah there is differing beliefs, also about Indra, basically Krishna came and exposed Indra to the people, I'm not sure exactly what but I think Indra was holding his power against them, and Krishna came and basically removed the need of Indra being worshipped by saying they already have what they needed or something, and Indra wanted to force the people to make them worship him I think with a threat? So Krishna stopped him and the peoples decided to worship Krishna instead, and some people actually still do worship Indra.
3
Stereotypes about Sikh guys
in GUPT FORUM
Posted
Punjabis are organized crime and international the top guys are making millions they aren’t low level at all. They have kilos lol