Akalifauj

Members
  • Content count

    929
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Everything posted by Akalifauj

  1. Rehat is more dear to the Guru than a Sikh. Keep talking only the dead are listening. Satguru is the guide and boat. The gurmukh teaches how to paddle across by his guru given wisdom. The mind is evil and selfish. Satguru doesn't want speech, for Akal Purakh has spoken. The head is to be in the feet of the Guru, rolling in the dirt.
  2. The girl who wrote this piece is of very low character. No credible research would have been done. This is the case of I have messed up my life, so should others because I am miserable. Search her up, she exposes herself openly to the world. No shame in her.
  3. Once again 3HO are at it trying to justify their practices of yoga. Through an article written by Harjinder Singh Khalsa, the claim is yoga (posture, breathing, mudras and mental techniques), specifically kundalini yoga aids the mind to where the person is able to focus on Shabad Guru. This sounds very innocent and some are probably fooled by it too. Let me rephrase, a lot of Punjabi Sikhs are fooled by this teaching of 3HO. Harjinder Singh Khalsa tries his best to make a case for 3HO. 3HO have been sought after because they make many wild claims. They use numerology to name one manmat practice. Yet some Sikhs like Harjinder Singh Khalsa feel 3HO are being targeted for no reason. I'm start off with what Harjinder Singh Khalsa says, yoga does not lead to mukti. This is very true and yet he goes off on a tanget and says kundalini is approved in Gurbani to help aid the mind for meditating on Gurbani. From Harjinder Singh Khalsa article it is evident he does not have the knowledge to interpret Gurbani or he intentionally went with an English translation that will sway his reader to approve of kundalini yoga as an aid. Or he's lazy and did not check with credible sources on interpreting Gurbani. On ang 909 Satguru is speaking about what is the true way to achieve mukti. Satguru directly speaks to yogis and their false show of being holy, they have lost the plot and don't know how to achieve mukti. Harjinder Singh Khalsa at the beginning of the article accuses others of not presenting shabads in the correct manner, who speak against yoga. But Harjinder Singh Khalsa leaves this line out when quoting ang 909. jogI jugiq gvweI hMFY pwKMif jogu n pweI ]10] ਜੋਗੀ ਜੁਗਤਿ ਗਵਾਈ ਹੰਢੈ ਪਾਖੰਡਿ ਜੋਗੁ ਨ ਪਾਈ ॥੧੦॥ jogee jugat gavaae'ee handdai paakhandd jog na paae'ee ||10|| (ਹੇ ਸੰਤ ਜਨੋ! ਧਾਰਮਿਕ ਭੇਖ ਦੇ) ਪਖੰਡ ਨਾਲ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਦਾ ਮਿਲਾਪ ਹਾਸਲ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੁੰਦਾ; (ਜਿਹੜਾ ਜੋਗੀ ਨਿਰਾ ਇਸ ਪਖੰਡ ਵਿਚ ਪਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੈ, ਉਸ) ਜੋਗੀ ਨੇ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ-ਮਿਲਾਪ ਦੀ ਜੁਗਤੀ (ਹੱਥੋਂ) ਗਵਾ ਲਈ ਹੈ, ਉਹ (ਵਿਅਰਥ) ਭਟਕਦਾ ਫਿਰਦਾ ਹੈ ।੧੦। Yogi, you have lost the Way; you wander around confused. Through hypocrisy, Yoga is not attained. ||10|| Harjinder Singh Khalsa went out of his way to accuse others, but get's caught in his own arrogances. He quotes ang 909 to say the following: siv nagaree mehi aasan baisai gur sabadhee jog paaee ||11|| Sitting in Yogic postures in the City of God, through the Word of the Guru's Shabad, you shall find Yoga. ||11|| dhhaathur baajee sabadh nivaarae naam vasai man aaee ||12|| Restrain your restless wanderings through the Shabad, and the Naam will come to dwell in your mind. ||12|| (Guru Amar Das J; GGSJ: 909) When I went on Sikhitothemax.com, I found the same translation into English on their site. Whoever did these translations did a horrible job of representing the Guru. The line in bold tells a lot about the person who did the translations. "Siv nagaree" is being translated as "city of God". Here the word "Siv" is referring to the devta Shiva as the Hindu God. Yet the translator refuses to say shiva and writes God. For whatever reason the translator refuses to do a literal translation for this first part. But then for the second part of the tuk, the translator has no problem doing a literal translation of "mehi aasan baisai"....."sitting in yogic postures". You can't have it both ways, when it comes to translating. It's one or the other; be literal or describe the allegory. Anyone reading this translation will be completely misdirected as Harjinder Singh Khalsa. So how should this be translated. We know from other Shabads, Shiva is not seen as Vaheguru and is not to be taken as the Guru either. Therefore a literal translation of the line is not correct. To translate "mehi aasan baisai" literally to suit a person's agenda will not be happening here. Neither will "Siv nagaree" be translated to promote someone else's agenda. "Siv nagaree" in Gurmat is speaking about dasam dwar. A Sikh in the dasam dwar is to "mehi aasan baisai" which means to gain focus. On what do we gain focus on in the dasam dwar? Guru's Shabad and the end result is Jog (not yoga). Jog means union with Vaheguru. So here is the whole line together: siv nagaree mehi aasan baisai gur sabadhee jog paaee ||11|| In the dasam dwar focus on the Guru's Shabad and gain union with Vaheguru. Here is another translation in Punjabi below. Those who can read Punjabi can see, "siv nagaree" is being translated as sadh sangat and "mehi aasan baisai" is translated as focused on Guru Shabad. isv ngrI mih Awsix bYsY gur sbdI jogu pweI ]11] ਸਿਵ ਨਗਰੀ ਮਹਿ ਆਸਣਿ ਬੈਸੈ ਗੁਰ ਸਬਦੀ ਜੋਗੁ ਪਾਈ ॥੧੧॥ siv nagaree mahi aasaN baisai gur sabadhee jog paae'ee ||11|| (ਹੇ ਸੰਤ ਜਨੋ! ਜਿਹੜਾ ਜੋਗੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਦੇ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਵਿਚ ਜੁੜਦਾ ਹੈ, ਉਸ ਨੇ) ਗੁਰ-ਸ਼ਬਦ ਦੀ ਬਰਕਤ ਨਾਲ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ-ਮਿਲਾਪ ਹਾਸਲ ਕਰ ਲਿਆ ਹੈ, ਉਹ ਜੋਗੀ ਸਾਧ ਸੰਗਤਿ ਵਿਚ ਟਿਕਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ (ਮਾਨੋ) ਆਸਣ ਉਤੇ ਬੈਠਾ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੈ ।੧੧। When you look up Bhai Sahib Singh translation in Punjabi, he translates exactly the same as the Punjabi translation above So at this point we have achieved the goal to say yoga, kundalini yoga postures are not promoted in Gurbani. There is more to say on this article written by Harjinder Singh Khalsa, but I will have to save it for another day. I have added the link to Harjinder Singh Khalsa article below. https://www.sikhnet.com/news/yoga-sikhism
  4. How can you follow gurbani when you can't read Gurbani in gurmukhi and which means you can't understand Gurbani. These are all lies. Sant ji in a video gives a reason to why women are not in punj pyare. The reason has nothing to do with women being pure or impure. You stated in a later post, your husband checks to see what is said in punjabi because you can't understand punjabi. Since you lied about what sant ji said, this mean your husband the punjabi interpreter also cant understand punjabi. My initial assessment of you being worse than a blind Hindu is spot on.
  5. You can't even understand and read punjabi or gurmukhi. Then you put words in Sant ji mouth. You can't even read and understand Gurbani, yet you are telling me and Sant ji what Gurbani says???? You are worse than the Hindus who Gurbani says are blind. English translations done by yoga worshippers is not a repsentation of my Guru; Gurbani. You have not even entered the door of Gurbani,standing a thousand feet outside, yet you have the nerve to run your mouth on Sikh forums.
  6. Faithless cynics have this idea the social structure of society did not allow women to play a leader role in society at the time of the Gurus, hence their was no women Guru's in Sikhi. Throughout Sikh history there have been women who took the lead in Sikh processions. Sikh women have been given leader roles by the Gurus. Sikh women took the leader role for Manji Sahib's. The faithless cynics argument is baseless. So why were their only Guru's who took the male form? Because Akal Purakh made it that way. As he commands things come into play. Akal Purakh also asked for heads on 1699. The people who stood up to this call were all men. Men only stood up because that's what Akal Purakh hukam (command) was. No one, but those 5 men would have stood up and given their head that day. Did not matter if their was a Sant sitting in the sangat on that day. Only those 5 men were commanded by Akal Purakh to stand up and present themselves to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji. Bhai Jaita ji (after taking amrit became Bhai Jeevan Singh ji) was sitting in the sangat when the call was made by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji. If you know the history of Bhai Jaita ji, you would understand the deep meaning of mentioning his name. Bhai Jaita ji was the one who risked his life and household to bring back Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Sahib ji head to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji. This Gurmukh was sitting in the sangat, do you not think he would have given his head for the next Guru, when he risked his life for the last Guru? We can play the "what if" game all day and nothing of value would become of it because we are not following Akal Purakh hukam to accept his decision. Do you think it was just by chance the five men who stood up, just happened to be from different caste? What do you take Akal Purakh to be some poker player?....I need 5 heads....Brahma bets 2 men and 3 women, Krishna bets 16000 women, shiva bets on one man? It was going to be 5 men in the position of Punj Pyare and that was his command. Jap ji Sahib says look at how many are singing Vaheguru's praises in so many different ways, but only those who follow his command are approved. The faithless cynics believe they are in control, I want to go left, I go left. It's all arrogant beliefs. Vaheguru's hukam can't be changed or altered. Vaheguru hukam is perfect.
  7. Why are you guys entertaining this lost cause. She was causing a mess at Sikh awareness with her illogical posts. She has a problem. She has no true knowledge of Gurbani, Sikh history, or writings. She flaps her arms around hoping someone will pay attention to her. She has anger issues and self hate. Remember the cartoons where the cat holds the ticking bomb hoping it won't explode but it does all the time. She is the cat. The bomb will go off and she will self destruct.
  8. If you would like to marry your brother, that is your choice. Keep the topic on point. Thanks.
  9. Can you think of any Sikh women that lead sangat in Gurmat processions in Sikh history from 1469 to 1708?
  10. Yes, and where is the equal rights to transgender people to be in punj pyare. What about those people in this world who believe they are animals (this is not a joke). Sgpc maryada by default becomes invalid because it discriminated. Clearly the people who made this rehat maryada did not understand Guru Granth Sahib ji.
  11. Poster mahakaal doesn't know what he is saying. There are other written documents of what happened on 1699 when Amrit was given. Bhai Jeevan Singh ji in Sri Guru katha tells the events as most people know it today. Bhai sahib was there and took Amrit that same day. Also baba Binod singh ji, jathedar of Buddha dal also tells the same events in Gurpur Parkash. When these women haters are asked why they can't provide reasons and when they do it show how illiterate they are on Sikh history, Gurbani, and writings. If I can get my hands on bhai jeevan singhs writings I will post it on the forum.
  12. You are the one who made the claim of women not being given amrit at all first then changed your position to women were given kirpan amrit. So it is on you to provide sufficient evidence for your claims. Clearly you didn't understand the humpty dumpty example provided for your simplistic arrogant mind. If I was to provide your evidence, I would be spoon feeding the clown college illiterate child by providing his own "evidence". Man O man you are Donald Trumps replica. And to further show how illiterate you are, you claimed kirpan amrit is given to women, the translated document you provide says nothing about women being given kirpan amrit. If the translated document is gospel this would make Buddha Dal and Hazur Sahib wrong on women getting kirpan amrit. As a result your original claim of Hazur Sahib and Buddha dal having the Guru given maryada is wrong. Also do you see how the author of your translated document doesn't even write down the 5 Bani were recited to make the amrit. Again Hazur Sahib and Buddha dal maryada will be wrong because they recite the 5 Banis to prepare amrit. My initial assessment was correct, you are a child. If Khande da Amrit was for only the fauj, then the Guru's have been fighting wars since Sri Guru Hargobind Sahib ji. Khande Da Amrit would have been initially given by the Sixth Guru, you illiterate arrogant little boy. Well do your homework little boy and find sources to make sense of it all. I know what is going on here, but I won't spoon feed the illiterate arrogant little child, so he can go and troll other forums and Sikhs with his illiterate beliefs. Time to put on big boy pants today. You can't push me around little boy. If you had done your research, you would know other Gursikhs who gave their life to the Guru wrote an account of what happened on 1699. This account is different than the English translated document you provided. Again no spoon feeding for you little boy.
  13. This is not proof. Provide Bhai chaupa Singh's rehat in its original writing. A guy puffing his chest for hazuri singhs and Buddha dal is providing McLeod translations. Lmao.... What's next Dr. Pashura singh writings. What happened to your predated stipulation of 1900 evidence only. Clown college presents translation dating from 1990 or so. Hi Mr. Bigly Trump.....lol
  14. This is coming from a person who used said a reason didn't exist and then turned around and said a doesn't exist because the second reason which I already said didn't happens is the reason why the first claim never happened. Also it's coming from a person who changed his position after being caught in his illerate assessment of Khande da Amrit, once charan pahul factual point was brought up and was given to both genders without any stipulation. Here let me show you This is the first time you have mentioned kirpan amrit and never say it in your first post. You do say the following: Then later in the post you speak about amrit and say the following: If you had not changed your position, the above would have said women were first given kirpan amrit by Buddha dal and naamdhari were the first to give khande da amrit. Let's say you made a mistake and was not clear on your post. Okay, I'm giving you a chance to clear it up. So one member quotes your post and poster jkvlondon gives you and example of Mata Bhago Kaur taking amrit. Now here is a perfect chance for clown college poster mahakaal to clear up according to his beliefs, woman did take amrit but they took kirpan amrit. But this never happens instead poster mahakaal writes the following: In the same post poster mahakaal is asking for proof of women taking amrit when he himself want to change his position later to say women were given amrit through kirpan amrit. Here it is: Now poster jkvlondon directly challenged you to present evidence to say Mata Bhao Kaur never took amrit. You did not provide any comment saying women were given kirpan amrit. Instead you say no women were given amrit. Clown college has done a number on your ability use logic. But let's go with your clown college taught rationality and say you made a mistake and forgot to mention women were given kirpan amrit. In his last post before he is presented with charan pahul being given to all Sikhs regardless of gender he writes the following. Again, I am giving him a lot to clear up his post and he had three post where he could have cleared up amrit was given to women through kirpan the amrit. But in his last post he repeats what he said in the first two post. Here it is: Nope didn't clear it up here either. Such a crucial point of how women were given amrit after being challenged by two poster and this clown college member couldn't remember to write women took amrit through kirpan amrit? Poster mahakaal, I officially give you the title of Mr. Bigly Trump. Then to add damage to insult he makes up the following example of how Punj Pyare would have to take amrit with their wives as a previous poster said a spouse can't take amrit without their spouse. Here it is: Read the first line, again he ask for proof for women receiving amrit. Amrit and women being or not being given amrit was clearly in his head, but his clown college brain couldn't pull out of his thick head, oooooo by the way women were given kirpan amrit. This poster mahakaal clearly changed his position after I presented charan pahul was given to all Sikhs regardless of gender and in the same way. I can't believe I am wasting my time on this thick headed child. I told him don't play with fire, but Mr. Bigly Trump couldn't resist. Chalo let's get into rest of his nonsense post. Humpty dumpty claims there is no evidence of him sitting on the wall, so how could he fall off the wall? I will provide evidence humpty dumpty sat on the wall after you provide what evidence Hazur Sahib Sikhs and Buddha dal have to say women never took khande da amrit. Okay, finally some hint of honesty. But I won't take the bait. Provide evidence for Mata Sundri ji and Mata Sahib Kaur ji as well. You made the claim and now it's time to present it. And no humpty dumpty business. For the same reason naamdhari claim Baba Ram Singh says he was the next Guru of the Sikhs. baba Ram Singh ji never claimed he was the Guru, but naamdhari continue to do so. Again stop with the humpty dumpty business or I will be forced to call you Mr. Bigly Trump from this day forward. Okay, I'm drop the clown college business because I can see your problem. I won't mention it here because it will only embarrass you even more than you have been. The Punj Pyare took amrit and so did Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji from the Punj Pyare and then Sikhs from the sangat took amrit. Which may or may not have included the Punj Pyare wives and Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's wife. DamDami Taksal Rehat Maryada was written after Amrit was given to the sangat. Spouses receiving amrit together is instructions for Sikhs. Just to stay consistent, provide evidence on 1699 Amrit was given and it was given in the way you want to promote it. I clearly said before addressing your murti comment, your sentence is not clear. The murti got into Sri Harmandir Sahib because the British allowed it as the British had control of Sri Harmandir Sahib at the time. British didn't really care about Hazur Sahib because the hub, main place where Sikhs got directions from was Sri Akal Takht Sahib. Yet Hazur Sahib still was corrupted by the very same people who were set to protect it. In this whole mess of a post, you never answered my question, why would women not be given khande da amrit when they were equally given charan pahul? Since you changed your position. Here is another question, why are women given kirpan amrit and men are given khande da amrit according to your proof. If you have not caught on yet, I want proof for all your claims. You asked others for proof and now it's only fair to ask proof from you. I will be waiting for this proof. Don't run and hide.
  15. The kirpa and Shakti at Hazur Sahib is because of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji Maharaj and current Guru Dhan Dhan Satguru Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. If a place having so much Shakti and kirpa is your reason to say the place is not corrupt then how come in a previous post you say the following: When we know people who were blind have received the blessing of sight at Sri Harmandir Sahib. So this mean the SGPC thieves and Badal using Sri Harmandir Sahib golak as his personal bank account and the fact SGPC maryada is wrong never takes place because there is so much Shakti and kirpa there. Clearly logic and linking claim to reason was never taught to you. You're clown college teachings don't stand a chance to Gurmat. I had a whole post written up but it got deleted by mistake. Currently I don't have time to write it back up. Don't go anywhere, there is a lot more to come.
  16. In your previous post you say amrit from Punj Pyare was not given to women. You believe this to be true. The other side claims kaur was given to women who took amrit. Since you think women were never given Amrit before naamdhari started around 1850, you can`t say Mata Sahib Kaur ji never took amrit because her handwritten hukamname never put kaur in her name. How could she place Kaur in her name when you don`t even believe the initial event of taking Amrit by a women never happened, which would have allowed her to place kaur in her name. Once you use the primary claim of no women was given amrit. The secondary reason (hand written hukamname never had kaur in them) is nulled and can`t be a support for the primary reason. Guess what.......I`m just getting started with you. This will be a good brain refreshing exercise.
  17. Hazoor Sahib as Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji left it is very different than how it is today. Many false practices are taking place at Hazoor Sahib today. Not to mention it's run by a RSS leader/member currently by the name of Amrik Singh Varsikar. Buddha Dal claim their lineage goes back to the Sixth Guru and is named after Baba Budha ji. Amrit was first introduced by Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji as Charan Pahul. Bhai Gurdas ji has wrote this history in his vaaran (vaar 1, pauri 23). Bhai Gurdas ji writes Sikhs were given Charan Pahul by the Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji. There was no stipulation on which gender can take Charan Pahul or who can't, clearly stated Sikhs. Sixth Guru kept up the lineage of Charan Pahul as Amrit from the Punj Pyare started much later in 1699. Since Buddha Dal wants to claim their lineage all the way back to the first war fought by Sikhs (which were at the time of Sixth Guru), this would mean Buddha Dal followed Charan Pahul from the Guru given to Sikhs, which includes males and females. So the question for you to answer now is, what changed from Charan Pahul to Punj Pyare where women were never given Khande Di Pahul? This is your claim, women were never given amrit from the Punj Pyare, so substantiate it and tells us what changed. Provide references to where you find the answers and links, so you can be given a good lesson. Little kids shouldn`t play with fire... Well when you define Sikhi including manmat practices, then its very easily for the locals to follow that fake version of Sikhi. It's like the other deras who allow their followers to drink and smoke. All they have to do is make a false claim they are apart of the dera and like magic the dera followers are much stronger in their beliefs. Kesh and shastar only help when the shackles of manmat practices are lifted off the head. These poor people are enslaved by hindu rituals in the disguise of a Sikh identity. So what, they worship the very devta and devis Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji tells them not to worship in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji. Very confusing sentences, but I believe you are saying, the Hazoor Sahib leaders had no problem with mahants bringing murtis in Gurdwaras. If so, then you don`t have the basic understanding of Gurbani from Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji or Sri Dasam Granth Sahib ji. Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji called the murti worshipper a murakh (completely blind) and Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji says, he break murtis. The first and 10 Guru have made it crystal clear on not to allow murtis in Gurdwaras, which will basically turn into murti worship. Mahant were bringing in murtis of devta and devis who were never to be worshipped. So take your head out of the murti and maybe start reading Gurbani. If you are going to believe the claim of Naamdharis, then you also must believe Baba Ram Singh ji said he was the Guru of the Sikhs. Here I will give you a better example of your illogical reasoning. I was the first one to claim this poster, Mahakaal is a pandit terrorist who believes in cow worship. I claimed it, now it must be true. So mahakaal how does it feels to drink the urine of cows as you worship them.
  18. How is this being turned into an amusing article. A woman lost her life over an argument. If this old man felt disrespected, he should have disciplined his son a long time ago. The prisoners will make sure justice is served to him.
  19. I didn't provide evidence because everyone is well aware of sant ji katha is on gurmatveechar.com. go to the recording of Ang 285. You keep respecting gappi as you will keep respecting Sri chand. I can present sant ji katha on bhai Gurdas ji vaar saying he agrees with the final assessment of bhai Gurdas ji about Sri chand. But you will never change your views. So why even get into it with you. As I said in my first post your opinion is against Gurbani. I have heard all the lame and unsubstantiated argument your side put a to favor Sri chant as a saint.
  20. This guy's name is gappi in Taksal circles. There is no respect for him. Gappi says Sri Guru Arian Dev ji bowed to Sri Chand. Sant baba Gurbachan Singh ji tells this story and says the sampradiya say Sri Guru Arjan dev ji gave a big welcome but never says Guru Sahib bowed to Sri chand. So why did gappi add this part. Ask gappi the next time you see him about this. Next gappi wants to say Sri chand name will stay in Sri Guru Granth Sabih ji. Well Sri chand's name was already in Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. Sri chand was added because he disrespected Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji by turning his back on the next Guru and Sri Guru Nanak Dev ji. Gappi will always been known as gappi. Gappi is always fishing to find things to say in his katha sessions because he truly doesn't have a deep understanding of Gurbani and while fishing he throws in lies to make the story have some more flavor. Gappi will turn into a missionary if he could and got paid more money for it.
  21. This rss agent is straight crazy. The hindus directly insult Sikhi by saying the following: 1) Why do you tie that thing on your head ? to keep your head from exploding ? 2) Why do you people wear that dagger ? *after I explained him , "So if a sikh woman is gonna chop vegetables, but forgets her knife in kitchen, can she use Kirpan?" 3) What do you do if you gotta ride a bike ? how you going to wear your helmet ? 4) What you gonna do if you got an itch on your head ? how you gonna scratch ? *laughs* You are very thick headed. You should be the crash test dummy for vehicles.
  22. Read the Hukam Guru Sahib gave him. Ignorance is bliss. I never commented on shiva state so keep your deep rooted hate bottled up inside.
  23. The fact you call dhumma, baba dhumma shows your biased views. No one in there right mind will call him Baba dhumma, unless they were trying to make clear, who they were referring to, which is not in your case as it is dhumma who we are speaking of and no one is mistaken. But let's forget that for a second and talk about Charitorpakhyan. In Charitorpakhyan the advice Sri Guru Tegh Bahadur Sahib ji gave to Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji is there. So how can this be a translation from old historical granths and difficult language like Sanskrit to simple language to what can be understood? Also in Sri Charitorpakhyan there is Chaupai Sahib by your plot to support dhumma you have supported to say Chaupai Sahib was not written by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji, but already written by someone else in an older text and Satguru translated it. Dhumma mentions Chaubees Avatar being written in older granths and Guru Sahib translated it into a simpler language. Again this midget is wrong because Guru Sahib with his own pen wrote the true story of Chaubees Avatar and did not translate from old granths in his own simple language. You can't save dhumma, he sank himself with this video even further into hell. You can try to hide the truth. Problems will only get worse for your fake baba because the more you try to cover it up the more chances I have to expose your lies and speak the truth about the video. It's unfortunate the missionaries had or found the video, but I am very happy they have exposed the video. It shows how uneducated dhumma really is on Gurbani.
  24. Listen to the hukamnama you were given by Guru sahib. By claiming to such people your religion is false will be speaking in ego because you want to get revenge for they insulted Sikhi. Best thing you can do is work on yourself. Know the knowledge and teach it to actually educate others on who Shiva was. Not to degrade a person.
  25. When I discovered dhunda joining two lines of Gurbani from different angs this poster was praising me for finding the deception by missionaries. Recently I put up a topic exposing Sikh Voice ( facebook missionary) on lying and distorting Bhai gurdas ji vaar. Yet I'm with the missionary!! I tell you why this poster is trying to do a character assassination of me. This poster is in bed with dhumma deep. If I did not mention dhumma this poster would have stayed quiet. Last time I presented the dhumma video, he sent me two nasty private messages. I reported them to the admin and now he has a grudge against me. He would send me another nasty private message but he fears to be put on quality control. Only reason this poster supports dasam bani is because dhumma does. Since this dhumma video came out disrespecting dasam bani. Now this poster has changed his views from saying all of dasam bani is the gurus bani to some of it is translations direct from Hindu granths. This poster is not aligned with the guru but the dhumma cult.