Jump to content

superkaur

Members
  • Content count

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by superkaur

  1. I've been noticing this trend of so called "white flight" where the white people fled area's in the west where non-white communities had migrated into. However this is usually seen in the lense of the whites being racist and they only wanting to be with their own race of people. I however disagree I dont think its a mostly racist migration of whites to "white area's" I would say its a flight from area's that become more economically poor or culturally they cant relate to. So the area where I lived in the UK changed from being a quite mixed white, hindu, sikh, muslim, black area to one where the muslims had taken over demographically by sheer numbers either through immigration from other counties, conversions or large birth rate population over the years. And I noticed the whites, hindus and Sikhs gradually move out of these area's rather than stay and "fight" for their home towns/streets. The economically well off non-muslims fled to better off area's where there was more affluence and where they was more people like them living there. And where once hard working friendly hindu's sikhs whites dominating these high street shops and areas where I lived now I only seen halal food outlets, women in burka's and muslims and black and mixed race council estate hooded face covered chav's bringing a dark threatening environment. And as the muslims moved in those economically deprived but reasonable socially cohesive area's then that area went further downhill fast into higher crime and less friendly and safe environment on the streets. Similarly this is true of other area's in the world where muslims migrate to non-muslim lands and area's at the determent of that area/nation and slow fleeing of that non-muslim population to other area's. But I am wondering where will they flee to when Islam eventually creepingly like a long dark evil shadow takes over populations and area's. In my view there will come a time where there is no area or land available for non-muslims to flee to they will have to either submit to islam or give a fight response if they are to retain their unique religious or cultural identity or practices.
  2. I was watching gurinder chandha's documentary recently where some interesting points where made about how jinnah had met winston churchill before partition where they had quite warm words exchanged in letters and held secret meetings with each other. Winston churchill hated the Indians especially brahmin hindus in his documents and overall opposed and hated the idea of india for wanting to leave the British empire. He also hated Muhammadans and Islam as he had stated it in documents yet when he talks to jinnah in letters he is said to have said warm words about Islam. Maybe he was lying to hide churchills real feelings towards both communities and get jinnah on his side. So I'm wondering did churchill along with the British ruling classes (including royal family) deliberately get cripss to draw a line to divide punjab deliberately dividing nanakana sahib and amritsar knowing it would cause mayhem in the Sikh community enough for them to resort to take up armed resistance to resist the split of their homeland. Meaning violence would have been the deliberately objective by the british enough for it to be wide spread it would either: 1) Prevent the British leaving as Indians would be begging the British administration and army to stay on longer to control the violence and continue its governance. or 2) Splitting the united india into two countries would be a parting revenge shot to the Indian's for their insistence of the British leaving. Also having pakistan as a base to continue their efforts in south asia would be handy since the Indians had enough of the British raj. Churchill knew the Sikhs are a martial faith community, he know most of them come from punjab, he also knew they would fight to stop their holy places and land being left in muslim hands. It seems having known all these things the unforgivable act of partitioning punjab was a deliberate policy to ensure Sikhs were used in the evil game plan.
  3. When muslims have 50+ countries over 1 .3 billion population and huge rich governments of iran, saudi, turkey, central asian republics, gulf states, etc and muslims and commanded to only give charity to muslim causes via zakat. Why are our very few Sikh charity organisations wasting our very limited financial and manpower resources helping non-sikhs in far off non-sikh lands where the people have no interest in Sikhs or sikhism and would not come to our aid if we ever get in trouble as in 1984 proved. Sikhs 30 million population, no country to our name and struggling religious minority fighting for faith and nation since 1947 due the treacherous dogs of sikh leadership who continually sold the kaum out. christian aid they have 3 billion christian population rich western countries and vatican bank chuch isnt helping rohingya, hindus have 1 billion population they never helped non-hindus charity causes ever. Rohingya will be helped by their muslim breathin eventually there is no doubt about that. Us Sikhs do not need to go off on far off adventures to far off places aimlessly if are not there to help the people embrace sikhi with parchar. Question is why is khalsa aid continuing to pursue non-sikh charity causes when there's plenty of causes within the Sikh community that needs urgent attention and help but no help is given. (ie afghan Sikhs dwindling population due to persecution and discrimination, pakistani sikhs struggling financial hardships, indian sikhs in deep poverty and struggling especially families of Shaheeds killed by govt violence). Whats the agenda? foreign adventures? collecting money? Ravi singh is doing a great job showing he is a humanitarian and at promoting the humanitarian side of Sikhi which is great however, where is his and his orgs priorities? They seem to be lost in my view.
  4. Sooner or later most of our jobs that we do today are going to be taken over by intelligent AI machines everyone is talking about it in IT tech circles. Already we have seen many jobs lost with automation. My uncles worked in the car industry making ford cars they lost their jobs in the late 80s to automated robots and machinery and so had to look for new jobs which meant financial and social upheaval for their lives at their households. And one of the values in Sikhi is doing good honest hard work and share with others. How are Sikhs meant to reconcile with this key value of doing a good days hard work if most of our jobs will be taken by AI machines? What will Sikhs do for income and staying true to Guru Nanak Ji's message? People say governments will be forced to give us all a universal wage to live on for the basics which is all well and good but as a human being we need work as a purpose to life and without work many will have a negative outlook on their lives I feel. Are Sikhs of today and tomorrow ready for the robot future?
  5. I wouldnt be suprised I think there will come a point where "enterprising" business minded and less spiritually inclined greedy commitee members will start actually implementing that as a quick cash cow. Also there is actually a roti making machine at darbar sahib now and they have upgraded it for greater capacity. Roti automation is not a bad thing its actually a good idea however if they start doing other stuff like robotic sewa when the AI revolution hits India then it would be truly a slippery slope. As selfless sewa is also one of the key values in Sikhi. All these new innovations will leave many Sikh philosophers, theologions and intellectuals with a lot to think about in order to help guide the community staying true to sikhi while living in an increasing intelligent AI and robotic dominated future for humanity.
  6. No i was watching a bbc 2 documentary on it and saw a few youtube ones also recently. What did they say on LBC? Elon musk is also the one spearheading the growth of AI and automation with his tesla driverless cars. He is right though, there are so many dangers with AI not least with these billionaires having all the jobs, money and control and therefore power in their elitist hands whereas rest of humanity will be left to suffer consequences of their decisions. I agree Just imagine that a robotic gyani thats all we need, better if there was robotic gurdwara committee members lol they probably would do a better job for the sangat.
  7. I agree with that, especially where the Indian secular and hindu nationalists atttempt to rewrite history by painting india as once being a united land which was then ravaged by first the islamic moghuls and later the british christian and other european powers. When the truth was india never was a united country there was no country called india. That land of the indian subcontinent had various competing hindu and buddhist and jain kingdoms and empires way before the abahramic outsiders arrived. And yes your right the "Indian" Bengali troops from mysore of the British east india company were foreigners to punjab and were treated us such by the punjabi population whom were largely muslims I suspect alot of rape and looting was carried out by the so called victors and so an historical grudge has been held against the bengali's. Thats probably why to this day there is this hatred for bengalis mostly by pakistani punjabi muslims and in their revenge against them came out atrocities in 1971 when pakistani army raped their women and genocided their fighting age men to show their dominance and subjugation of the cheeky independence wanting bengali's
  8. Its not that we do not want them to live in their own muslim area's thats exactly what we want them to do, to live amoungst themselves and away from us non-muslims. The problem is that they come into our Sikh or other non-muslim area's slowly one by one in order to eventually take it over. So yes they do live to live in Sikh dominated area's not because they love to live with us but to take advantage of our safer hard working community neighborhoods with a view to eventually overrun it. So wherever you flee to, eventually the islamic question the islamic problem will come to your doorstep even if it isnt there yet eventually within 10-20years your area too will be overrun by muslims unless its somewhere out in the countryside or some sleepy far off town no one wants to live in except the elderly or rich. The amount of muslim migrants and refugee's that the west allows in is disgusting. All muslim immigration should have been stopped 30years ago because the demographics trend is that the poor countries around the world are mostly muslim dominated and so naturally they would want to migrate to richer non-muslim lands because islam is a failed economic ideology. They produce huge amounts of children and then feed of the state in the west contributing little or nothing for the nation.
  9. Yes I heard about handsworth too, my cousin was telling me how it used to be dominated by apnay and other punjabi's and now its increasingly has more muslims and roma gypsies and other economically poor eastern european's. Same thing happened to southall only 20 years ago it was well established punjabi sikh and hindu area but there was signs islam is creeping in with pakistani's moving in taking over the restaurants and Somalian refugee's being put up in tax payer funded flats and moved there permanently. And now when you go to southall instead of it being mini punjab or mini india its slowly looking like mini pakistan or mini saudi arabia. Slough has the highest Sikh population in the UK but even there I suspect there are dark times ahead unless Sikhs start to think collectively and more right wing and self preservation. Wherever islam takes over demographically then people realise that your siblings and your offspring will be in danger of being groomed for sexual exploitation by muslims, grooming for conversion to islam or bullying/harrasment/discrimination. Hence why they flee those area's understandably.
  10. That's where your wrong paji, divide and rule was a policy widely and expertly used by the British imperialists who learn't their trade from the roman empire that had conquered them. Your right about they not being responsible for the existing divisive circumstances that already existed in south asian religious communities however what they did was exploit those differences, widened them and enhanced them to use them for the geo-political economic advantage just as they do today in the middle east and africa. I watched a documentary years ago on how the white european colonialists in africa interfered in rwanda / congo social structure by giving tutsis positions in power in 1900's and putting the hutu's in lower social status and thus lower end jobs. Then when these countries gained independence from their former western white colonial masters those decades of resentment and hate for the other tribe built up and unleashed itself in a huge genocide and inter-tribe conflict where 1 million tutis were horribly massacred by the hutu tribe. When the british ruled that area they had made the tutis appear they were genetically superior to hutu's they egged them on about their qualities against the inferior hutu's which was done deliberately to create the divide and rule conflict and separation between the communities so that rather than the africans uniting and removing the white western colonial cancer amoungst them they ended up spending their energies on fighting each other while the white masters stood back and ruled over their domains. Similarly this tactic of divide and rule was exploited in south asia / indian subcontinent also. They used territories they had already conquered or had come under their protectorate to wage war or supply troops from to fight against other south asian kingdoms and empires so that rather than the indian's uniting and fighting the common european colonial powers they were fighting amoungst themselves and in-turn being subjugated by their european white masters. So if we relate this to our own Punjabi Sikh kingdoms and empire. They first conquered south indian bengali kingdoms then central indian then used troops from there to conquer pataila, jind, faridkot, nabha and finally using that manpower and resources to fight Ranjit Singh's Sikh empire of punjab, having divided and ruled. And so when it came to partition in 1947 they gave covert support and political power to jinnah and his pakistani muslim league to take punjab, bengali and cause division and strife against the idea of a free united india without british interference and rule which was against british interests so they had to do something to keep their stake in indian subcontinent.
  11. I think the topic has deviated a little from the focus I was trying to get to and where it has landed. Focus should be on racist Winston churchill and the racist british establishment overall how they cleverly played the game of divide and rule. We have memoirs of winston churchill where he praises the Sikhs where he stood up for Sikhs right to wear kirpan in the UK which is great. However he was a very scheming man and a political opportunist as he refereed to indians, hindus brahmims, Islam and muslims in derogatory racist terms. He clearly wanted Indians to be disunited and wanted to cause them pain for allegedly British rule ending there. So by warming up to jinnah and giving him support of Pakistan he wanted to ensure india remained divided and suffered huge communal violence/genocide. I wouldn't put it past the calculating churchill and co egging on and funding the cannon fodder martial punjabi sikhs (ie Sikh princely state rulers, sikh army generals, sikh jatha's) to physically fight to curve out a khalistan/sikhistan knowing full well it would cause a bloodbath inflecting pain for the disobedient breakaway indian slaves but also be fruitless goal for the Sikhs for nationhood as it would not be allowed to become a reality because it was decided that pakistan would be officially and legally recognized as its main base of operations there if or when india decides to have nothing to do with UK trade links and started to look at the soviet USSR russian enemy for military support and trade.
  12. Good reply, this yoyo is a mild muslim nationalist he doesnt realise how non-muslims see what we are seeing with their demographic threat to other cultures and religions. Islam is like the borg in star trek you wither get taken over and absorbed within it or destroyed there's no other way to co-exist with large muslim populations in the long term. The main bones of contention with the buddhists not only of burma but of sri lanka and thailand too is the looming muslim demographic population threat. They have held back for years not to rock the boat but I think they have realised they have to deal with the muslim question sooner or later and they are dealing with it now rather than later. Its sad on a human level the sane humans will sympathize with anyone thats being genocided, ethnically or religiously cleansed out of their lands or area's they lived for generations but in the wider historical and regional context this is a religious and ideological struggle for survival for the buddhists and Buddhism in their last bastions of self rule and existance. Whereas islam has 50+ countries as its state religion and vast area's of land and resources where rohingyas could be resettled and accommodated also the muslim illegal migrants and refugee's that headed to europe have no business being in non-muslim lands they should be settled in muslim rich lands to live the islamic life their faith requires.
  13. Ravi Singh needs a Nobel Prize

    Although I admire ravi singh in many ways for being a humanitarian and he clearly has pro-sikhi creditianls often battling hindutva extremists on twitter when exposing crimes against Sikhs by the indian govt however I feel his org Khalsa Aid is not actually khalsa Aid its not aiding Sikhs its aiding mostly non-sikhs and thats a fundamental flaw in its remit, its vision and goal as a Sikh charity it should be purely Sikh centric and its missed the mark for years now. The first time I heard of khalsa Aid was back in April 2000 during vaisakhi nagar kirtan some guys with labels of help for kashmiri Sikhs were collecting funds in buckets for the victims of the chattisinghpura anti-sikh massacre by islamo-fascist jihadis during bill clintons visit there. I thought wow our sikh brothers and sisters affected there are being helped by fellow Sikhs at last as I had never seen charities rising funds to help only Sikhs. I give some money but over the years I realised this Khalsa Aid and united Sikhs org are fake news are a sham they are not muslim charities where they only help their fellow muslims they are a charity that mascarades as a Sikh charity but in essence goes off helping more non-sikhs if anything. Ravi singh as an individual is doing great for the image of Sikhs worldwide so aint going to knock him for that, I support him fully in helping yazadi's especially as they have no one that supports or helps them in the world whereas rohingya muslims have vast number of muslims and muslim govt's to help them. Ravi singh does deserve humanitarian award but his organisation doesn't really deserve the respected title of a Sikh charity that only belongs to charities that actually using hard earn sangats money to help our brethren or spreads sikhi via parchar.
  14. so recently a pakistani mirpuri muslim friend of mine told me she wanted to marry her Sikh boyfriend (whose a mona/sehajdhari) whom she been dating since college days for 5years. I told her she would have to embrace Sikhi if she wanted to marry him in an anand karaj sikh ceremony. She said she is not that religious but would be willing to look into it or might have to do a non-religious court marriage. Then I asked her what did her muslim friends and family thought about the idea of her marrying a non-muslim guy. She said they didnt take it well and were not happy about it and are putting emotional blackmail pressure on her. Her older sister who is a pretty fundamentalist muslim told her to pressure her boyfriend to convert to islam as according to her the bloodline is carried by the male so marrying a non-muslim is not halal so her marriage it would be zina in islam (punishable by stoning to death in sharia law) and all the family would not turn up to the wedding nor would it be accepted by allah as you have been influenced by shaitan (satan/devil) and in the next world you will be punished in eternal hellfire as this world is nothing but a test and the next world is the real world so do not marry a non-muslim. This is the talk and advice muslim girls are given to ensure they do not go out with non-muslim guys or not be with them long term. Meanwhile if non-muslim girls wanted to marry a muslim guy they are welcomed with open arms by muslims and groomed to ensure they do convert. I was never taught not to marry non-sikh guys nor given any religious consequences or advice why I shouldn't by family or friends but its clear to me having chatted to many muslim girls that they are taught from early age against being with non-muslim guys. I had to do my own research looking into sikh scriptures and use my intelligence to know why Sikh girls should only marry other Sikhs to ensure the future survival of our faith and why we should welcome muslim girls and other non-sikh girls to embrace Sikhi.
  15. That's another great post and several points I agree with. I was also going to raise the point about some idiotic naklee Sikhs would be actually crazy enough in welcoming in of muslim rohingya to indian punjab which would be an absolute demographic disaster for Sikh majority and now economically poor punjab. As much as I have sympathy for the rohingya as a human being as a humanitarian I would never welcome them to india let along punjab at most I would give my 2 pennies worth to help contribute some sort of food for them and get bangladesh or Un or muslim countries resolve the issues they having with burma buddhists. Also another issue is that the buddhists have been facing hundreds of years of religious and ethnic cleansing of traditions dharmic lands by muslim invaders and hordes from Afghanistan to the steps of central asia to the far east all was hindu lands then and then buddhist land but always in the hand of dharmic open eastern faiths. The abrahmic faith branches do not have that peaceful co-existence mindset, their mindset is demographic take over and population replacement with their faith group either through warfare or population demographic replacement through missionary work, breeding out through love jihad with non-believer women or higher birth rate. And sadly thats the dangers the buddhists have know realised is facing their countries of sri lanka, burma, thailand and so on if they dont get their muslim populations on a tight leash.
  16. Very true. The immigrant Sikh punjabi men when they marry to non-sikh women these women adopt Sikhi and kids are given Sikh names and brought up as such. But the so called Sikh punjabi girls who marry non-sikh men they dont even see it as a problem they actually think in Sikhi everything goes I knew some girls years ago that actually believed Sikhi doesn't have any religious restrictions against such things. So clearly its the limited knowledge or lack of knowledge of Sikhi that some of these women have been brought up that has allowed them to think this way. Punjabi girls with mixed belief systems in their parental and family structure are most vulnerable to this kinda thinking and easy to be lead stray. Also parents give more attention to their sons ensuring they marry the same background of girl rather than their daughters. Daughters are seen as someone who will leave the house anyways so they wont carry on the family surname anyways so they arent given as much attention sadly. Mothers especially insist their sons only marry indian hindu sikh girls but dont insist the same for their daughters. This is the mindset we need to change urgently to ensure daughters especially only marry sikh men.
  17. Helping people in need whatever their background is a good deed in Sikhi yes. However what Khalsa Aid and united Sikhs are are and have been doing is very different issue to what Bhai Kanhaiya did. What Bhai Kanhaiya did was help people on the battlefield who was trying to fight and kill Sikhs. He helped people regardless who they was in the particular scenario and environment he didnt go out of his way to mughul or hindu towns to help the needy he only helped the people who was in front of him at the time who needed water that is the example he set and Guru Ji told us to follow. That when you are presented with someone asking for help in front of you that you help them regardless of their background even if they are from the people trying to kill you. However Guru Ji didn't say go out to non-sikh places and towns and help the people even if your own sikh community needs help and is suffering. There is no where in Sikh history or scriptures that state you must go out to help non-sikhs at the expense of your own sikh brothers and sisters wasting sangats very limited and hard earned resources. When Sikhs who allegedly mean to do well for humanitarian causes go out to non-sikh places and help them they are not following Sikhi they are following their brainwashed humanitarian ideology or own selfish agendas. Guru Ji also said create an area of self rule because without political sovereign power with all the functions of a state you cant help your own people properly nor you can help needy others from other communities. Liberal far left ideology that tries to brainwash Sikhs into thinking rush out to foreign far flung lands to help everyone is wholly wrong, against logic and common sense and I would put it its wholly against the future progression of spreading Sikhi. As at the moment Sikh populations in important key area's are dwindling cos Sikhs are not helping them meanwhile abrahamic populations are increasing at an alarming rate in dharmic lands aided by their rich abrahmic political states while stupid Sikhs with no idea of future demographically impact are helping them survive and thrive at our own expense.
  18. Racism in the work envroment

    yeah seems weird he seems to have had racism problems with two different managers or the same one but they changed genders? I'm confused too
  19. Majority of Hindus are good people and often pro-sikh however there is a particular nasty fringe far right minority amoungst them that really hate Sikhs and Sikhi with a passion. The handful of canadian based Indian Hindu extremists were exposed before in this website. So how do we combat the menace of hindu indian extremism especially in canada where they are openly targeting Sikhs online with anti-sikh propaganda especially on youtube, twitter and facebook. Are Sikhs not clever enough to create counter anti-hindu material and anti-hindu propaganda videos? Why does it seem majority of Sikhs especially in the west so tolerant of being abused online and offline.. Are Sikhs being lame sitting ducks again like 1940s and 1980s where their leaders preach love, co-existence and peace while their faith is getting slapped around and their paghs ripped off by evil hindu extremists and their allied Canadian racist jewish and "white" nationalists? Check the links below this is just a handful of anti-sikh material by american and canadian based hindu extremists. And these propaganda pieces have real life consequences for innocent sikh civilians as they influence deranged people to attack our brothers and sisters. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4BF9fVygQckE1SjNXHiRzg http://vancouver.mediacoop.ca/newsrelease/5748 http://www.risecanada.com/meet-senior-advisors/ http://www.sikh24.com/2013/08/19/exclusive-canada-a-safe-haven-for-anti-sikh-lobbyists-and-goi-agents/ Sikhism Exposed - YouTube http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mJqgXA_a2cEJ:frontlinepunjabiyouth.blogspot.com/2008/04/hindu-man-wants-1984-to-happen-in.html%3Fm%3D0+&cd=15&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl
  20. Good idea if you got ways to implement it, there needs to be more people politically aware of canada based hindu extremists. I'm sure canada must have some laws against hate speech and calls to violence all which ron bannerjee has advocated against Sikhs in the past. I'm amazed no canadian Sikh group has got the authorities to take action against him and his racist hindu jewish group of nutjobs. This one man group + a handful of canadian jewish extremists + social media / internet can be quite powerful if you spread hate against your victims to violent ignorants. Remember hitlers mein kemp and views was just that. It was all in the head of one deranged man until he spread his hateful views about jews and others by his book and speeches and soon there was mayhem against minorities in 1930s germany. Ron bannerjee is a very ugly mentall ill hindu bengali extremist but dangerous also because of his ability to spread evil the calls for violence and hate against sikhs, muslims and others.
  21. True, so the question is how are we going to implement real life real world consequences for these western / canada based hindu indian extremists let them know Sikhs will not tolerate this abuse any more. Its time for that fight back that push back to smash the face of indian hindu extremism and hindu terrorism as a collective group. They need political outlawing and legal consequences for their hate advocacy against Sikhs and our faith.
  22. anyone watch these 2 documentaries that were made? if so whats your thoughts?
  23. I was watching some videos on youtube the other day and came across this old hindu guy called Rajiv Malhotra he seems to be influencing the younger Indian generation towards hindu nationalism. Evil Sakshi Bhardwaj the anti-sikh infamous hindu extremist who recently made highly offensive videos against Sikhs and Sikhi is a follower and admirer of this guy. https://twitter.com/RajivMessage/status/5808820218718
  24. You are right However this is not our fault as a people, this is the fault of external pressures from hindutva groups and SGPC our so called leadership they are happy to be subservient to RSS and New Delhi to avoid the troubles of 1980s 90s. And through lack of firm action and standing up for Sikhi they have created a generation of confused hindunised Sikhs which is exactly the thing they were trying to avoid in when they drew up the ill thought out rehit maryada to force all Sikhs become Khalsa's and pushing Sehajdhari Sikhs into the camps of Hindu punjabi Hindutva groups which in turn lead to troubles in punjab. The brahmin sena and shiv sena grew their hair long and beards wore turbans became fake khalsa's and killed Sikhs and innocents to give Sikh Seperatists a bad name in punjab. One way or another they will enforce their rule on us until we are truly free of them. The brahmin and hindtuva groups will never stop trying to pull Sikhs and Sikhi into the fold of hinduism either through military and terrorist means as they did in 1980s 90s. Or through buying off or infiltrating Sikh orgs with keshdhari hindus posing as Sikhs like they have done in ancient past and do so presently. Sikhs need to recognise this reality as fact first before we can move to a better future
×