Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


superkaur last won the day on September 3

superkaur had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

320 Excellent

About superkaur

  • Rank
    Aisay Gur Ko Bal Bal Jaaeeai

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

512 profile views
  1. 100% agree it is all down to the elites ie the ruling class (politicians, banksters, royals, oligarchs,etc). They are the one's that dictate how society lives and what way it is to go. So all these muslim immigrants and refugee's coming in for decades is not really the fault of the muslims per say but the ones that enable them to come in. They are not letting them in for a humanitarian reason nor political its more about the economics and societal shift and upheaval they want. The alt-right wingers and white nationalists often complain that the ruling class or middle class never have these mass muslim iimmigrance or refugee problems in elites area's cos they dump them on the working class area's and they have a valid point . The elites can see the debt that europe/west is building up and the only way to get out of it is constant war with other nations on false pre-texts or pre-texts they had prepared in advanced years ago cos they could see what would happen. The way things are going they do want a civil war in europe with the muslim immigrants. As the muslim population increases so will the tension increase with the native white european populations which is exactly what the elites are looking for. One will go hunting for the elites while they are busy killing each other, but when civil war does break out people will probably go looking for the elites and hunting them down like wild dogs just like what happened to the russian czer royal family during the soviet communist revolution. Watch a video called "everything is a rich mans trick" it opened my eyes how the rich people (the elites) are the ones that fund both sides in any conflict for their political agenda's and make a profit on top of it.
  2. What a weird post. So you dont see a problem and your advocating Islamification of non-muslim area's and muslim take over right? Off course Sikhs also commit crime but not as much as muslims and other faith or non faith groups do. On the whole Sikhs are a law abiding community your always going to get a few bad apples in a community however Islam has a particular bad problem in every country that community settles in with sexual/rape grooming of non-muslim girls, drug dealing gangs, murders, terrorism. etc. So its an ideological problem, they arent taught right from wrong they are taught 7th century arabia wrong thinking wrong way of living in a modern world where them teachings in quran and hadiths are not acceptable.
  3. I wouldnt be suprised I think there will come a point where "enterprising" business minded and less spiritually inclined greedy commitee members will start actually implementing that as a quick cash cow. Also there is actually a roti making machine at darbar sahib now and they have upgraded it for greater capacity. Roti automation is not a bad thing its actually a good idea however if they start doing other stuff like robotic sewa when the AI revolution hits India then it would be truly a slippery slope. As selfless sewa is also one of the key values in Sikhi. All these new innovations will leave many Sikh philosophers, theologions and intellectuals with a lot to think about in order to help guide the community staying true to sikhi while living in an increasing intelligent AI and robotic dominated future for humanity.
  4. No i was watching a bbc 2 documentary on it and saw a few youtube ones also recently. What did they say on LBC? Elon musk is also the one spearheading the growth of AI and automation with his tesla driverless cars. He is right though, there are so many dangers with AI not least with these billionaires having all the jobs, money and control and therefore power in their elitist hands whereas rest of humanity will be left to suffer consequences of their decisions. I agree Just imagine that a robotic gyani thats all we need, better if there was robotic gurdwara committee members lol they probably would do a better job for the sangat.
  5. Sooner or later most of our jobs that we do today are going to be taken over by intelligent AI machines everyone is talking about it in IT tech circles. Already we have seen many jobs lost with automation. My uncles worked in the car industry making ford cars they lost their jobs in the late 80s to automated robots and machinery and so had to look for new jobs which meant financial and social upheaval for their lives at their households. And one of the values in Sikhi is doing good honest hard work and share with others. How are Sikhs meant to reconcile with this key value of doing a good days hard work if most of our jobs will be taken by AI machines? What will Sikhs do for income and staying true to Guru Nanak Ji's message? People say governments will be forced to give us all a universal wage to live on for the basics which is all well and good but as a human being we need work as a purpose to life and without work many will have a negative outlook on their lives I feel. Are Sikhs of today and tomorrow ready for the robot future?
  6. I agree with that, especially where the Indian secular and hindu nationalists atttempt to rewrite history by painting india as once being a united land which was then ravaged by first the islamic moghuls and later the british christian and other european powers. When the truth was india never was a united country there was no country called india. That land of the indian subcontinent had various competing hindu and buddhist and jain kingdoms and empires way before the abahramic outsiders arrived. And yes your right the "Indian" Bengali troops from mysore of the British east india company were foreigners to punjab and were treated us such by the punjabi population whom were largely muslims I suspect alot of rape and looting was carried out by the so called victors and so an historical grudge has been held against the bengali's. Thats probably why to this day there is this hatred for bengalis mostly by pakistani punjabi muslims and in their revenge against them came out atrocities in 1971 when pakistani army raped their women and genocided their fighting age men to show their dominance and subjugation of the cheeky independence wanting bengali's
  7. Its not that we do not want them to live in their own muslim area's thats exactly what we want them to do, to live amoungst themselves and away from us non-muslims. The problem is that they come into our Sikh or other non-muslim area's slowly one by one in order to eventually take it over. So yes they do live to live in Sikh dominated area's not because they love to live with us but to take advantage of our safer hard working community neighborhoods with a view to eventually overrun it. So wherever you flee to, eventually the islamic question the islamic problem will come to your doorstep even if it isnt there yet eventually within 10-20years your area too will be overrun by muslims unless its somewhere out in the countryside or some sleepy far off town no one wants to live in except the elderly or rich. The amount of muslim migrants and refugee's that the west allows in is disgusting. All muslim immigration should have been stopped 30years ago because the demographics trend is that the poor countries around the world are mostly muslim dominated and so naturally they would want to migrate to richer non-muslim lands because islam is a failed economic ideology. They produce huge amounts of children and then feed of the state in the west contributing little or nothing for the nation.
  8. Yes I heard about handsworth too, my cousin was telling me how it used to be dominated by apnay and other punjabi's and now its increasingly has more muslims and roma gypsies and other economically poor eastern european's. Same thing happened to southall only 20 years ago it was well established punjabi sikh and hindu area but there was signs islam is creeping in with pakistani's moving in taking over the restaurants and Somalian refugee's being put up in tax payer funded flats and moved there permanently. And now when you go to southall instead of it being mini punjab or mini india its slowly looking like mini pakistan or mini saudi arabia. Slough has the highest Sikh population in the UK but even there I suspect there are dark times ahead unless Sikhs start to think collectively and more right wing and self preservation. Wherever islam takes over demographically then people realise that your siblings and your offspring will be in danger of being groomed for sexual exploitation by muslims, grooming for conversion to islam or bullying/harrasment/discrimination. Hence why they flee those area's understandably.
  9. I've been noticing this trend of so called "white flight" where the white people fled area's in the west where non-white communities had migrated into. However this is usually seen in the lense of the whites being racist and they only wanting to be with their own race of people. I however disagree I dont think its a mostly racist migration of whites to "white area's" I would say its a flight from area's that become more economically poor or culturally they cant relate to. So the area where I lived in the UK changed from being a quite mixed white, hindu, sikh, muslim, black area to one where the muslims had taken over demographically by sheer numbers either through immigration from other counties, conversions or large birth rate population over the years. And I noticed the whites, hindus and Sikhs gradually move out of these area's rather than stay and "fight" for their home towns/streets. The economically well off non-muslims fled to better off area's where there was more affluence and where they was more people like them living there. And where once hard working friendly hindu's sikhs whites dominating these high street shops and areas where I lived now I only seen halal food outlets, women in burka's and muslims and black and mixed race council estate hooded face covered chav's bringing a dark threatening environment. And as the muslims moved in those economically deprived but reasonable socially cohesive area's then that area went further downhill fast into higher crime and less friendly and safe environment on the streets. Similarly this is true of other area's in the world where muslims migrate to non-muslim lands and area's at the determent of that area/nation and slow fleeing of that non-muslim population to other area's. But I am wondering where will they flee to when Islam eventually creepingly like a long dark evil shadow takes over populations and area's. In my view there will come a time where there is no area or land available for non-muslims to flee to they will have to either submit to islam or give a fight response if they are to retain their unique religious or cultural identity or practices.
  10. That's where your wrong paji, divide and rule was a policy widely and expertly used by the British imperialists who learn't their trade from the roman empire that had conquered them. Your right about they not being responsible for the existing divisive circumstances that already existed in south asian religious communities however what they did was exploit those differences, widened them and enhanced them to use them for the geo-political economic advantage just as they do today in the middle east and africa. I watched a documentary years ago on how the white european colonialists in africa interfered in rwanda / congo social structure by giving tutsis positions in power in 1900's and putting the hutu's in lower social status and thus lower end jobs. Then when these countries gained independence from their former western white colonial masters those decades of resentment and hate for the other tribe built up and unleashed itself in a huge genocide and inter-tribe conflict where 1 million tutis were horribly massacred by the hutu tribe. When the british ruled that area they had made the tutis appear they were genetically superior to hutu's they egged them on about their qualities against the inferior hutu's which was done deliberately to create the divide and rule conflict and separation between the communities so that rather than the africans uniting and removing the white western colonial cancer amoungst them they ended up spending their energies on fighting each other while the white masters stood back and ruled over their domains. Similarly this tactic of divide and rule was exploited in south asia / indian subcontinent also. They used territories they had already conquered or had come under their protectorate to wage war or supply troops from to fight against other south asian kingdoms and empires so that rather than the indian's uniting and fighting the common european colonial powers they were fighting amoungst themselves and in-turn being subjugated by their european white masters. So if we relate this to our own Punjabi Sikh kingdoms and empire. They first conquered south indian bengali kingdoms then central indian then used troops from there to conquer pataila, jind, faridkot, nabha and finally using that manpower and resources to fight Ranjit Singh's Sikh empire of punjab, having divided and ruled. And so when it came to partition in 1947 they gave covert support and political power to jinnah and his pakistani muslim league to take punjab, bengali and cause division and strife against the idea of a free united india without british interference and rule which was against british interests so they had to do something to keep their stake in indian subcontinent.
  11. I think the topic has deviated a little from the focus I was trying to get to and where it has landed. Focus should be on racist Winston churchill and the racist british establishment overall how they cleverly played the game of divide and rule. We have memoirs of winston churchill where he praises the Sikhs where he stood up for Sikhs right to wear kirpan in the UK which is great. However he was a very scheming man and a political opportunist as he refereed to indians, hindus brahmims, Islam and muslims in derogatory racist terms. He clearly wanted Indians to be disunited and wanted to cause them pain for allegedly British rule ending there. So by warming up to jinnah and giving him support of Pakistan he wanted to ensure india remained divided and suffered huge communal violence/genocide. I wouldn't put it past the calculating churchill and co egging on and funding the cannon fodder martial punjabi sikhs (ie Sikh princely state rulers, sikh army generals, sikh jatha's) to physically fight to curve out a khalistan/sikhistan knowing full well it would cause a bloodbath inflecting pain for the disobedient breakaway indian slaves but also be fruitless goal for the Sikhs for nationhood as it would not be allowed to become a reality because it was decided that pakistan would be officially and legally recognized as its main base of operations there if or when india decides to have nothing to do with UK trade links and started to look at the soviet USSR russian enemy for military support and trade.
  12. Good reply, this yoyo is a mild muslim nationalist he doesnt realise how non-muslims see what we are seeing with their demographic threat to other cultures and religions. Islam is like the borg in star trek you wither get taken over and absorbed within it or destroyed there's no other way to co-exist with large muslim populations in the long term. The main bones of contention with the buddhists not only of burma but of sri lanka and thailand too is the looming muslim demographic population threat. They have held back for years not to rock the boat but I think they have realised they have to deal with the muslim question sooner or later and they are dealing with it now rather than later. Its sad on a human level the sane humans will sympathize with anyone thats being genocided, ethnically or religiously cleansed out of their lands or area's they lived for generations but in the wider historical and regional context this is a religious and ideological struggle for survival for the buddhists and Buddhism in their last bastions of self rule and existance. Whereas islam has 50+ countries as its state religion and vast area's of land and resources where rohingyas could be resettled and accommodated also the muslim illegal migrants and refugee's that headed to europe have no business being in non-muslim lands they should be settled in muslim rich lands to live the islamic life their faith requires.
  13. Ravi Singh needs a Nobel Prize

    Although I admire ravi singh in many ways for being a humanitarian and he clearly has pro-sikhi creditianls often battling hindutva extremists on twitter when exposing crimes against Sikhs by the indian govt however I feel his org Khalsa Aid is not actually khalsa Aid its not aiding Sikhs its aiding mostly non-sikhs and thats a fundamental flaw in its remit, its vision and goal as a Sikh charity it should be purely Sikh centric and its missed the mark for years now. The first time I heard of khalsa Aid was back in April 2000 during vaisakhi nagar kirtan some guys with labels of help for kashmiri Sikhs were collecting funds in buckets for the victims of the chattisinghpura anti-sikh massacre by islamo-fascist jihadis during bill clintons visit there. I thought wow our sikh brothers and sisters affected there are being helped by fellow Sikhs at last as I had never seen charities rising funds to help only Sikhs. I give some money but over the years I realised this Khalsa Aid and united Sikhs org are fake news are a sham they are not muslim charities where they only help their fellow muslims they are a charity that mascarades as a Sikh charity but in essence goes off helping more non-sikhs if anything. Ravi singh as an individual is doing great for the image of Sikhs worldwide so aint going to knock him for that, I support him fully in helping yazadi's especially as they have no one that supports or helps them in the world whereas rohingya muslims have vast number of muslims and muslim govt's to help them. Ravi singh does deserve humanitarian award but his organisation doesn't really deserve the respected title of a Sikh charity that only belongs to charities that actually using hard earn sangats money to help our brethren or spreads sikhi via parchar.
  14. That's another great post and several points I agree with. I was also going to raise the point about some idiotic naklee Sikhs would be actually crazy enough in welcoming in of muslim rohingya to indian punjab which would be an absolute demographic disaster for Sikh majority and now economically poor punjab. As much as I have sympathy for the rohingya as a human being as a humanitarian I would never welcome them to india let along punjab at most I would give my 2 pennies worth to help contribute some sort of food for them and get bangladesh or Un or muslim countries resolve the issues they having with burma buddhists. Also another issue is that the buddhists have been facing hundreds of years of religious and ethnic cleansing of traditions dharmic lands by muslim invaders and hordes from Afghanistan to the steps of central asia to the far east all was hindu lands then and then buddhist land but always in the hand of dharmic open eastern faiths. The abrahmic faith branches do not have that peaceful co-existence mindset, their mindset is demographic take over and population replacement with their faith group either through warfare or population demographic replacement through missionary work, breeding out through love jihad with non-believer women or higher birth rate. And sadly thats the dangers the buddhists have know realised is facing their countries of sri lanka, burma, thailand and so on if they dont get their muslim populations on a tight leash.