Khalistanisinghni
-
Posts
83 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Calendar
Forums
Everything posted by Khalistanisinghni
-
WJKK WJKF, thought we could appreciate some work from our brothers/sisters. this is the first writer, the name of the writer is unknown and some beautiful work below! (Should we start a series for the purpose?)
-
Will post then!
-
Wanted to share a few young writers' work, but was not sure if the place to
-
-
While I agree with you, they claim to be promoting sikhi in their own way. Speaking up for Khalistan/Punjab? (Though I personally don't look up to them) -
Bhenji, found some beautiful katha on jeevani of Mata sahib Kaur ji by giani thakur singh ji on gurmatveechar.com, do have a look!
-
Nindaks of Maharaj ji's bani and trying to act so smart as to use every opportunity to go against what mahapurkhs say. The bibis are too indulged in this whole idea of equality and sikh panth is therefore lacking great women to look up to.
-
Guess i have to work on readings and katha
-
She is the same person commenting on this video as well ...
-
There were over 80,000 Sikhs. Not sure where did you get the 35K.
-
TBH, your language just proves the brothers correct. What about go ask guru ji? I dare not say what Sant giani jarnail singh ji said was untrue and you are "smarter". So good day. WJKK WJKF
-
That was a whole lot to digest. But glad to see someone who actually has some real knowledge
-
WAHEGURU.
-
What about taksal's maryada? Puratan maryada of dal is still khande da amrit since scholars from the dals stand by women who take khande da amrit. (The absence of any amrit for women in the beginning and the the development of kirpan da amrit just show that pita ji forgot about for the women and they had to add it when they realised there was "mistake" I.e. Amritdhari singhs couldn't eat the food cooked by their non-amritdhari women)
-
Harkiran kaur bhenji, SGPC maryada is not the panthic maryada. It has not been accepted. I rather follow the maryada from taksal/dals that can be dated back to the times guru sahib. They don't show women as inferior, they just accept as he plays, they are filled with sant/mahapurkh when SGPC is filled with, nvrm.
-
Why is it when in the hukam of akal purkh, the five who stood up happened to be male, ready to become Singhs and khalsa. So if the panth was allowed, they would let female children represent the chaar sahibzaade in the name of equality. To whom shall are you showing this side of equality, what are you/anyone trying to prove by having the bibis in between the singhs. I just fail to see equality here but just manmat
-
So did pita ji ask for a Sikh's head, not that of a man or woman. But then there is something called surgun saroop, the panj pyare who stood up became the surgun saroop and now the male are used SIMPLY TO represent that surgun saroop, they obviously come from mothers with avasta. So there, this is the sewa a woman can do, give birth to great gursikh pyare by being a gursikh themselves. Also, I wonder why no sikh woman ever thought of having to mess with this part of sikhi, if I am not wrong, I have seen a woman commenting under a video of sant jarnail singh ji khalsa bhindranwale with the same name and logic, and tbh one of the reasons for this post. Read the history, read some books. (I don't even know what the masands have to do here)
-
There are many like her in Canada/Australia/The US/UK. With parents being gursikh and the daughters/sons quite so to the other side. Perhaps it's the fame they get or the attention
-
Why would you ever have this video up on YouTube.
-
Oh then it's not gurmat maryada, it's manmat maryada. Forget about it, was never a maryada approved by the panth, do read the disclaimer next time! clearly not able to see why is it that women have so many other sewas at gurdwara but would love to participate in panj Pyare. Had they really believed the Khalsa to not have any gender, they would have know that the gurus, sahibzaade and pyares were physically male for a reason while spiritually same as us women.
-
Is this the maryada from SGPC
-
Mata gujar kaur ji stood by Guru tegh bahadhur maharaj ji when they were doing bhagti and did it together. (One of many examples)
-
Basically, if we bring women back to Sikhi- the original version the Singhs will improve to marry these women in Chardikala, chardikala wale bhujangis/bhujangans will be born from these chardikala wale couple, and khalsa raj. (Except that it is not an easy job and will only be successful when it appeals to him, so perhaps what we can do for now is read more bani and do ardaas benti)
-
Loved the solutions, will take time but should be quite effective unless women will again ignore the help they are being offered from their own sisters and look for it in the hands of their liberal friends.
-
I personally doubt don't know if the women need help or are constantly ignoring the help they already can get/are getting
