I have said it before & will say it again, i never have and never will use pangtia from mahraj for an online debate. I am surprised that during your 'studying & interpreting' you did not come across harsh/bitter language that mahraj used when it was called for? Or are you one of those 'modern' scholars who reads one pangti & takes it at face value, has no idea of how to do real deep khoj or how to understand the greater dexterous picture that mahraj beautifully paints for us, your type tend to put gurbani in a tunnel vision perception. I could list many pangtia from mahraj, dasam bani & even rehitnameh where mahraj has used harsh/bitter insulting language because it was obviously called for.
I stick by my description of this panthpreet, idiots like him are the ones causing the average naive Sikh to have tunnel vision views on Sikhi. Listen to his 'katha' & then compare that to the likes of Baba Gurbachan Singh Bhindranwale, Baba Hari Singh Randhawa, Giani Sher Singh ambala, Giani thakur Singh, sant maskeen ji etc
Within Nihang Singh dals there is a natural tendency to call a spade a spade & say it how it is. A phudu is a phudu & this guy in my opinion is one.